Georgia vs Morocco: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas

Georgia
89.3%
in 2024
Morocco
91.3%
in 2024
Georgia rank
33rd
Morocco rank
31st

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • Georgia
  • Morocco
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 91.3% against 89.3% in Georgia, a difference of 2.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 33rd and Morocco ranks 31st of 105 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Morocco in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Morocco Difference Ahead
2000s 78.3% 70.6% 7.7% Georgia
2010s 82.7% 81.4% 1.3% Georgia
2020s 89.2% 90.2% 1.0% Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Georgia or Morocco?
Morocco, at 91.3% against 89.3% in Georgia as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Georgia and Morocco?
2.0%, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Morocco?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Georgia and Morocco rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
Georgia ranks 33rd and Morocco ranks 31st of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.