Georgia vs Ukraine: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas

Georgia
89.3%
in 2024
Ukraine
88.3%
in 2024
Georgia rank
33rd
Ukraine rank
35th

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • Georgia
  • Ukraine
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 89.3% against 88.3% in Ukraine, a difference of 1.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ukraine ahead.

Georgia ranks 33rd and Ukraine ranks 35th of 105 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Ukraine Difference Ahead
2000s 78.3% 93.5% 15.2% Ukraine
2010s 82.7% 89.1% 6.4% Ukraine
2020s 89.2% 88.3% 0.9% Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Georgia or Ukraine?
Georgia, at 89.3% against 88.3% in Ukraine as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Georgia and Ukraine?
1.0%, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Ukraine?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Georgia and Ukraine rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
Georgia ranks 33rd and Ukraine ranks 35th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.