Gibraltar vs Hong Kong (China): Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source
Gibraltar
100
in 2024
Hong Kong (China)
100
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
1st
Hong Kong (China) rank
1st
Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source over time
- Gibraltar
- Hong Kong (China)
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 100 against 100 in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Gibraltar ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 1st and Hong Kong (China) ranks 1st of 105 countries.
Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Hong Kong (China) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 98.75 | 1.25 | Gibraltar |
| 2010s | 100 | 99.62 | 0.3843 | Gibraltar |
| 2020s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source, Gibraltar or Hong Kong (China)?
- Gibraltar, at 100 against 100 in Hong Kong (China) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source between Gibraltar and Hong Kong (China)?
- 0, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Hong Kong (China)?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Gibraltar and Hong Kong (China) rank globally for urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source?
- Gibraltar ranks 1st and Hong Kong (China) ranks 1st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.