Gibraltar vs Monaco: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Gibraltar
100.0%
in 2024
Monaco
100.0%
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
1st
Monaco rank
1st
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time
- Gibraltar
- Monaco
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Monaco, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 1st and Monaco ranks 1st of 105 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Gibraltar or Monaco?
- Gibraltar, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Monaco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Gibraltar and Monaco?
- 0.0%, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Monaco?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Gibraltar and Monaco rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
- Gibraltar ranks 1st and Monaco ranks 1st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.