Hong Kong vs San Marino: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Hong Kong
100.0%
in 2024
San Marino
100.0%
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
1st
San Marino rank
1st
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time
- Hong Kong
- San Marino
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in San Marino, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 105 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.8% | 100.0% | 1.2% | San Marino |
| 2010s | 99.6% | 100.0% | 0.4% | San Marino |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Hong Kong or San Marino?
- Hong Kong, at 100.0% against 100.0% in San Marino as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Hong Kong and San Marino?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and San Marino?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Hong Kong and San Marino rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
- Hong Kong ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination.