Iraq vs Philippines: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas

Iraq
64.6%
in 2024
Philippines
62.2%
in 2024
Iraq rank
62nd
Philippines rank
64th

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • Iraq
  • Philippines
0204060200020122024

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 64.6% against 62.2% in Philippines, a difference of 2.4%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.

Iraq ranks 62nd and Philippines ranks 64th of 105 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 61.5% 60.4% 1.1% Iraq
2010s 63.6% 61.3% 2.3% Iraq
2020s 64.6% 62.0% 2.6% Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Iraq or Philippines?
Iraq, at 64.6% against 62.2% in Philippines as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Iraq and Philippines?
2.4%, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Philippines?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Iraq and Philippines rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
Iraq ranks 62nd and Philippines ranks 64th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.