Israel vs Lithuania: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas

Israel
99.5%
in 2024
Lithuania
99.3%
in 2024
Israel rank
15th
Lithuania rank
16th

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • Israel
  • Lithuania
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Israel currently reports 99.5% against 99.3% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.2%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 15th and Lithuania ranks 16th of 105 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 99.7% 94.5% 5.3% Israel
2010s 99.6% 98.3% 1.3% Israel
2020s 99.5% 99.3% 0.2% Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Israel or Lithuania?
Israel, at 99.5% against 99.3% in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Israel and Lithuania?
0.2%, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Lithuania?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Israel and Lithuania rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
Israel ranks 15th and Lithuania ranks 16th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.