Kyrgyzstan vs Palestine, State of: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas

Kyrgyzstan
81.0%
in 2024
Palestine, State of
81.9%
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan rank
43rd
Palestine, State of rank
40th

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Palestine, State of
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports 81.9% against 81.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.9%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 43rd and Palestine, State of ranks 40th of 105 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
2000s 83.9% 78.5% 5.4% Kyrgyzstan
2010s 90.7% 81.4% 9.4% Kyrgyzstan
2020s 84.6% 81.9% 2.7% Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Kyrgyzstan or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at 81.9% against 81.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Kyrgyzstan and Palestine, State of?
0.9%, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Palestine, State of?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Palestine, State of rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 43rd and Palestine, State of ranks 40th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Palestine, State of: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-safely-managed-drinking-water-source/kyrgyz-republic/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-safely-managed-drinking-water-source/kyrgyz-republic/west-bank-and-gaza/">Kyrgyzstan vs Palestine, State of: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination.