Macao vs Saint Barthelemy: Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source
Macao
100
in 2024
Saint Barthelemy
100
in 2024
Macao rank
1st
Saint Barthelemy rank
1st
Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source over time
- Macao
- Saint Barthelemy
How they compare
Macao currently reports 100 against 100 in Saint Barthelemy, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Macao ahead.
Macao ranks 1st and Saint Barthelemy ranks 1st of 105 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Saint Barthelemy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.98 | 99.28 | 0.6993 | Macao |
| 2010s | 99.99 | 99.78 | 0.2095 | Macao |
| 2020s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source, Macao or Saint Barthelemy?
- Macao, at 100 against 100 in Saint Barthelemy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source between Macao and Saint Barthelemy?
- 0, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Saint Barthelemy?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Macao and Saint Barthelemy rank globally for urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source?
- Macao ranks 1st and Saint Barthelemy ranks 1st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.