Monaco vs Singapore: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Monaco
100.0%
in 2024
Singapore
100.0%
in 2024
Monaco rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time
- Monaco
- Singapore
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Singapore, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Monaco ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 105 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Monaco or Singapore?
- Monaco, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Monaco and Singapore?
- 0.0%, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Singapore?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Monaco and Singapore rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
- Monaco ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.