Myanmar vs Paraguay: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Myanmar
74.2%
in 2024
Paraguay
72.2%
in 2024
Myanmar rank
54th
Paraguay rank
56th
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time
- Myanmar
- Paraguay
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 74.2% against 72.2% in Paraguay, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Paraguay ahead.
Myanmar ranks 54th and Paraguay ranks 56th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 2 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.6% | 68.4% | 9.8% | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 71.2% | 70.5% | 0.7% | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 74.1% | 72.0% | 2.1% | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Myanmar or Paraguay?
- Myanmar, at 74.2% against 72.2% in Paraguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Myanmar and Paraguay?
- 2.0%, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Paraguay?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Myanmar and Paraguay rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
- Myanmar ranks 54th and Paraguay ranks 56th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.