North Macedonia vs Palestine, State of: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas

North Macedonia
84.7%
in 2024
Palestine, State of
81.9%
in 2024
North Macedonia rank
37th
Palestine, State of rank
40th

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Palestine, State of
020406080200020122024

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 84.7% against 81.9% in Palestine, State of, a difference of 2.8%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.

North Macedonia ranks 37th and Palestine, State of ranks 40th of 105 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
2000s 84.7% 78.5% 6.2% North Macedonia
2010s 84.7% 81.4% 3.3% North Macedonia
2020s 84.7% 81.9% 2.9% North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, North Macedonia or Palestine, State of?
North Macedonia, at 84.7% against 81.9% in Palestine, State of as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between North Macedonia and Palestine, State of?
2.8%, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Palestine, State of?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do North Macedonia and Palestine, State of rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
North Macedonia ranks 37th and Palestine, State of ranks 40th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Palestine, State of: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-safely-managed-drinking-water-source/north-macedonia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-safely-managed-drinking-water-source/north-macedonia/west-bank-and-gaza/">North Macedonia vs Palestine, State of: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination.