Serbia vs Sri Lanka: Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source
Serbia
81.6
in 2024
Sri Lanka
80.11
in 2024
Serbia rank
42nd
Sri Lanka rank
45th
Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source over time
- Serbia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 81.6 against 80.11 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.49.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Serbia ranks 42nd and Sri Lanka ranks 45th of 105 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.46 | 87 | 5.53 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 81.54 | 90.31 | 8.78 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 81.59 | 82.88 | 1.29 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source, Serbia or Sri Lanka?
- Serbia, at 81.6 against 80.11 in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source between Serbia and Sri Lanka?
- 1.49, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Sri Lanka rank globally for urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source?
- Serbia ranks 42nd and Sri Lanka ranks 45th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.