Saint Martin (French part) vs Turkmenistan: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas

Saint Martin (French part)
96.6%
in 2024
Turkmenistan
96.9%
in 2024
Saint Martin (French part) rank
23rd
Turkmenistan rank
22nd

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • Saint Martin (French part)
  • Turkmenistan
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 96.9% against 96.6% in Saint Martin (French part), a difference of 0.3%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Martin (French part) ahead.

Saint Martin (French part) ranks 23rd and Turkmenistan ranks 22nd of 105 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Saint Martin (French part) averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Martin (French part) Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
2000s 96.7% 87.5% 9.2% Saint Martin (French part)
2010s 96.7% 95.1% 1.6% Saint Martin (French part)
2020s 96.6% 97.0% 0.3% Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Saint Martin (French part) or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 96.9% against 96.6% in Saint Martin (French part) as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Saint Martin (French part) and Turkmenistan?
0.3%, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Martin (French part) and Turkmenistan?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Saint Martin (French part) and Turkmenistan rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
Saint Martin (French part) ranks 23rd and Turkmenistan ranks 22nd of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Martin (French part) vs Turkmenistan: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-safely-managed-drinking-water-source/st-martin-french-part/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-safely-managed-drinking-water-source/st-martin-french-part/turkmenistan/">Saint Martin (French part) vs Turkmenistan: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination.