Uganda vs Vanuatu: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas

Uganda
40.0%
in 2024
Vanuatu
38.3%
in 2024
Uganda rank
88th
Vanuatu rank
91st

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time

  • Uganda
  • Vanuatu
010203040200020122024

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 40.0% against 38.3% in Vanuatu, a difference of 1.7%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Vanuatu ahead.

Uganda ranks 88th and Vanuatu ranks 91st of 105 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uganda Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 22.0% 37.5% 15.5% Vanuatu
2010s 34.2% 37.9% 3.7% Vanuatu
2020s 39.9% 38.2% 1.7% Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Uganda or Vanuatu?
Uganda, at 40.0% against 38.3% in Vanuatu as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Uganda and Vanuatu?
1.7%, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Vanuatu?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Uganda and Vanuatu rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
Uganda ranks 88th and Vanuatu ranks 91st of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.