Malaysia vs South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Malaysia
0 million SLC per US$ of GDP
in 2024
South Africa
0 million SLC per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malaysia rank
98th
South Africa rank
97th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Malaysia
  • South Africa
0000197019972024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP against 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in Malaysia, a difference of 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 98th and South Africa ranks 97th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 5 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP Malaysia
1980s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP Malaysia
1990s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP Malaysia
2000s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP Malaysia
2010s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP Malaysia
2020s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Malaysia or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP against 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in Malaysia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Malaysia and South Africa?
0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and South Africa?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Malaysia and South Africa rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Malaysia ranks 98th and South Africa ranks 97th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-3/malaysia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-3/malaysia/south-africa/">Malaysia vs South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit
million SLC per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,833 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.