Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in South Africa

South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
0 million SLC per US$ of GDP
Change on year
down 12.5%
World rank
97th
of 179 countries
All-time high
0 million SLC per US$ of GDP
in 1971
All-time low
0 million SLC per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Years of data
55
1970–2024

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in South Africa, 1970–2024

00000197019972024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million SLC per US$ of GDP.

Analysis

The most recent figure for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in South Africa is 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.

The figure is down 12.5% on the previous year and up 0.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in South Africa peaked at 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 1971 and was at its lowest, 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, in 2011.

South Africa ranks 97th of 179 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in South Africa, year by year

Annual values for Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP in South Africa, 1970 to 2024.
Year million SLC per US$ of GDP Change
1970 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP
1971 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +7.6%
1972 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -5.1%
1973 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -35.6%
1974 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +4.8%
1975 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -11.8%
1976 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +1.7%
1977 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +1.5%
1978 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -8.6%
1979 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -19.9%
1980 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -22.5%
1981 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +1.5%
1982 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -0.7%
1983 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -31.0%
1984 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +26.3%
1985 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +58.4%
1986 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -6.3%
1987 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -22.1%
1988 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -4.6%
1989 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +10.4%
1990 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -20.4%
1991 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -0.5%
1992 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -33.4%
1993 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +20.5%
1994 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +3.5%
1995 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -28.4%
1996 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +30.5%
1997 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -2.5%
1998 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +4.6%
1999 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +7.2%
2000 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +4.5%
2001 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +8.4%
2002 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +11.7%
2003 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -34.0%
2004 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -22.3%
2005 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -9.0%
2006 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -10.1%
2007 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -6.1%
2008 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +25.8%
2009 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -5.9%
2010 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -21.2%
2011 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -7.1%
2012 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +7.3%
2013 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +13.2%
2014 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +16.7%
2015 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +5.9%
2016 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +1.6%
2017 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +1.0%
2018 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -5.4%
2019 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -2.7%
2020 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +35.7%
2021 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -13.5%
2022 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP +3.9%
2023 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -6.1%
2024 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP -12.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 10
1980s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 10
1990s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 10
2000s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 10
2010s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 10
2020s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 5

Countries ranked near South Africa

  1. 94 Czechia 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
  2. 95 Zambia 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
  3. 96 Tonga 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
  4. 98 Malaysia 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
  5. 99 Marshall Islands 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
  6. 100 Kiribati 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare

See the full ranking of 179 places →

More environment data for South Africa

All data for South Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in South Africa?
Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in South Africa was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in South Africa?
The highest recorded value was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 1971.
What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in South Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2011.
How does South Africa rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
South Africa ranks 97th out of 179 countries with data for 2024.
Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in South Africa?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this South Africa data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in South Africa. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-3/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-3/south-africa/">Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in South Africa</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices ÷ GDP (current US$)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit
million SLC per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,833 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.