How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Tunisia?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Finland vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Finland

0.0012 million SLC per person

in 2024

Tunisia

0.0013 million SLC per person

in 2024

Finland rank

120th

Tunisia rank

118th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Finland
Tunisia

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0013 million SLC per person against 0.0012 million SLC per person in Finland, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 120th and Tunisia ranks 118th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Finland	Tunisia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0003 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	0.0003 million SLC per person	Finland
1980s	0.0008 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0.0006 million SLC per person	Finland
1990s	0.0008 million SLC per person	0.0002 million SLC per person	0.0005 million SLC per person	Finland
2000s	0.0008 million SLC per person	0.0004 million SLC per person	0.0004 million SLC per person	Finland
2010s	0.0008 million SLC per person	0.0007 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Finland
2020s	0.0011 million SLC per person	0.0012 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Finland or Tunisia?: Tunisia, at 0.0013 million SLC per person against 0.0012 million SLC per person in Finland as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Finland and Tunisia?: 0.0001 million SLC per person, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Tunisia?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Finland and Tunisia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Finland ranks 120th and Tunisia ranks 118th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/finland/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/finland/tunisia/">Finland vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit: million SLC per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.