Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Tunisia
Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was 0.0013 million SLC per person in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Tunisia, 1970–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million SLC per person.
Analysis
In 2024, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Tunisia stood at 0.0013 million SLC per person. That is the highest value across all 55 years on record.
The figure is up 8.4% on the previous year and up 89.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Tunisia peaked at 0.0013 million SLC per person in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0 million SLC per person, in 1970.
Tunisia ranks 118th of 180 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | million SLC per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 million SLC per person | — |
| 1971 | 0 million SLC per person | +29.4% |
| 1972 | 0 million SLC per person | +30.7% |
| 1973 | 0 million SLC per person | -3.3% |
| 1974 | 0 million SLC per person | +24.2% |
| 1975 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +8.1% |
| 1976 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +3.8% |
| 1977 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | -1.6% |
| 1978 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +5.5% |
| 1979 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +3.2% |
| 1980 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +23.6% |
| 1981 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +11.1% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +8.7% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +4.3% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +25.3% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +24.7% |
| 1986 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | -18.3% |
| 1987 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +38.9% |
| 1988 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | -24.6% |
| 1989 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +18.4% |
| 1990 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +35.3% |
| 1991 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +15.8% |
| 1992 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +7.6% |
| 1993 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | -4.3% |
| 1994 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | -9.6% |
| 1995 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | -3.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +33.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +4.1% |
| 1998 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +0.8% |
| 1999 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +8.4% |
| 2000 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +0.9% |
| 2001 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +0.5% |
| 2002 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | -9.7% |
| 2003 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +19.2% |
| 2004 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | +15.9% |
| 2005 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | -1.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | +9.6% |
| 2007 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | +0.6% |
| 2008 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | -0.3% |
| 2009 | 0.0005 million SLC per person | +13.2% |
| 2010 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | -5.3% |
| 2011 | 0.0005 million SLC per person | +16.4% |
| 2012 | 0.0006 million SLC per person | +17.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0006 million SLC per person | +4.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0007 million SLC per person | +7.3% |
| 2015 | 0.0007 million SLC per person | +8.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0007 million SLC per person | -2.8% |
| 2017 | 0.0008 million SLC per person | +11.7% |
| 2018 | 0.0009 million SLC per person | +20.7% |
| 2019 | 0.001 million SLC per person | +6.5% |
| 2020 | 0.001 million SLC per person | +2.5% |
| 2021 | 0.0011 million SLC per person | +5.9% |
| 2022 | 0.0012 million SLC per person | +12.3% |
| 2023 | 0.0012 million SLC per person | -5.1% |
| 2024 | 0.0013 million SLC per person | +8.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 million SLC per person | 0 million SLC per person | 0.0001 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 million SLC per person | 0.0001 million SLC per person | 0.0002 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0002 million SLC per person | 0.0002 million SLC per person | 0.0003 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0004 million SLC per person | 0.0003 million SLC per person | 0.0005 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0007 million SLC per person | 0.0004 million SLC per person | 0.001 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0012 million SLC per person | 0.001 million SLC per person | 0.0013 million SLC per person | 5 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 115 Belize 0.0015 million SLC per person compare
- 116 Canada 0.0013 million SLC per person compare
- 117 Georgia 0.0013 million SLC per person compare
- 119 United Arab Emirates 0.0013 million SLC per person compare
- 120 Finland 0.0012 million SLC per person compare
- 121 Zimbabwe 0.0012 million SLC per person compare
More environment data for Tunisia
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -14.25 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -6.62 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.421 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 2.02 °C (2025)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 9.05 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual 9 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit 0 million USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per 0.0004 million USD per person (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Tunisia?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Tunisia was 0.0013 million SLC per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0013 million SLC per person in 2024.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 million SLC per person in 1970.
- How does Tunisia rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Tunisia ranks 118th out of 180 countries with data for 2024.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 89.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.