How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Tunisia

0.0013 million SLC per person

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0.0012 million SLC per person

in 2024

Tunisia rank

118th

Zimbabwe rank

121st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Tunisia
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0013 million SLC per person against 0.0012 million SLC per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Tunisia ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Tunisia	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Zimbabwe
1980s	0.0001 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0 million SLC per person	Zimbabwe
1990s	0.0002 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	Tunisia
2000s	0.0004 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0.0003 million SLC per person	Tunisia
2010s	0.0007 million SLC per person	0.0001 million SLC per person	0.0006 million SLC per person	Tunisia
2020s	0.0012 million SLC per person	0.0003 million SLC per person	0.0008 million SLC per person	Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Tunisia or Zimbabwe?: Tunisia, at 0.0013 million SLC per person against 0.0012 million SLC per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Tunisia and Zimbabwe?: 0.0001 million SLC per person, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Tunisia and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Tunisia ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/tunisia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/tunisia/zimbabwe/">Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit: million SLC per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.