Tunisia vs United Arab Emirates: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Tunisia
0.0013 million SLC per person
in 2024
United Arab Emirates
0.0013 million SLC per person
in 2024
Tunisia rank
118th
United Arab Emirates rank
119th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Tunisia
  • United Arab Emirates
00.0010.0010.0020.002197019972024

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0013 million SLC per person against 0.0013 million SLC per person in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0 million SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Tunisia ranks 118th and United Arab Emirates ranks 119th of 180 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1970s 0 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person United Arab Emirates
1980s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0009 million SLC per person 0.0007 million SLC per person United Arab Emirates
1990s 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0015 million SLC per person 0.0013 million SLC per person United Arab Emirates
2000s 0.0004 million SLC per person 0.0018 million SLC per person 0.0014 million SLC per person United Arab Emirates
2010s 0.0007 million SLC per person 0.0012 million SLC per person 0.0005 million SLC per person United Arab Emirates
2020s 0.0012 million SLC per person 0.0013 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Tunisia or United Arab Emirates?
Tunisia, at 0.0013 million SLC per person against 0.0013 million SLC per person in United Arab Emirates as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Tunisia and United Arab Emirates?
0 million SLC per person, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and United Arab Emirates?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Tunisia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Tunisia ranks 118th and United Arab Emirates ranks 119th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs United Arab Emirates: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/tunisia/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/tunisia/united-arab-emirates/">Tunisia vs United Arab Emirates: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.