Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Madagascar: Veneer sheets — Import value, annual growth rate

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
-44.07 % change on previous year
in 2024
Madagascar
56.52 % change on previous year
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
34th
Madagascar rank
32nd

Veneer sheets — Import value, annual growth rate over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Madagascar
-1000100200196219932024

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 56.52 % change on previous year against -44.07 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 100.59 % change on previous year.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.3 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 34th and Madagascar ranks 32nd of 38 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Madagascar Difference Ahead
1990s 24.63 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 124.63 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 27.72 % change on previous year 11.92 % change on previous year 15.8 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 17.59 % change on previous year 39.32 % change on previous year 21.73 % change on previous year Madagascar
2020s 10.45 % change on previous year 13.54 % change on previous year 3.09 % change on previous year Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher veneer sheets — import value, annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 56.52 % change on previous year against -44.07 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in veneer sheets — import value, annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Madagascar?
100.59 % change on previous year, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Madagascar?
26 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Madagascar rank globally for veneer sheets — import value, annual growth rate?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 34th and Madagascar ranks 32nd of 38 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Veneer sheets — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Madagascar: Veneer sheets — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/veneer-sheets-import-value-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/veneer-sheets-import-value-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/madagascar/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Madagascar: Veneer sheets — Import value, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Veneer sheets — Import value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
257 places, 9,626 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Veneer sheets — Import value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.