Libya vs Peru: Water productivity, GDP per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal

Libya
8.84 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal
in 2022
Peru
8.62 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal
in 2022
Libya rank
137th
Peru rank
138th

Water productivity, GDP per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal over time

  • Libya
  • Peru
01020304050197519982022

How they compare

Libya currently reports 8.84 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal against 8.62 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal in Peru, a difference of 0.22 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 137th and Peru ranks 138th of 179 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 15.42 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 9.41 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 6.01 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal Libya
2010s 10.68 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 6.63 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 4.05 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal Libya
2020s 8.67 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 7.48 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 1.19 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher water productivity, gdp per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal, Libya or Peru?
Libya, at 8.84 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal against 8.62 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal in Peru as of 2022.
What is the difference in water productivity, gdp per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal between Libya and Peru?
0.22 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Peru?
15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do Libya and Peru rank globally for water productivity, gdp per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal?
Libya ranks 137th and Peru ranks 138th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization (AQUASTAT), World Bank, and OECD (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Water productivity, GDP per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Peru: Water productivity, GDP per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization (AQUASTAT), World Bank, and OECD (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/water-productivity/libya/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/water-productivity/libya/peru/">Libya vs Peru: Water productivity, GDP per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Water productivity, GDP per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal
Unit
constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization (AQUASTAT), World Bank, and OECD (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
179 places, 6,112 data points, 1962–2022
Last refreshed

Water productivity is calculated as total gross domestic product (GDP), measured in constant 2015 US$ divided by annual total water withdrawal.