Maldives vs Singapore: Water productivity, GDP per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal

Maldives
1,220 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal
in 2022
Singapore
1,929 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal
in 2022
Maldives rank
4th
Singapore rank
1st

Water productivity, GDP per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal over time

  • Maldives
  • Singapore
01.0k2.0k3.0k197519982022

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 1,929 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal against 1,220 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal in Maldives, a difference of 709 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.6 times Maldives's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Maldives ahead.

Maldives ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 1st of 179 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 4 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 232.23 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 54.48 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 177.75 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal Maldives
1990s 322.16 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 66.61 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 255.55 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal Maldives
2000s 553.1 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 91.69 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 461.4 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal Maldives
2010s 1,119 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 484.45 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 634.53 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal Maldives
2020s 1,024 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 1,221 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal 197.03 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher water productivity, gdp per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal, Maldives or Singapore?
Singapore, at 1,929 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal against 1,220 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal in Maldives as of 2022.
What is the difference in water productivity, gdp per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal between Maldives and Singapore?
709 constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Singapore?
36 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2022.
How do Maldives and Singapore rank globally for water productivity, gdp per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal?
Maldives ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 1st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization (AQUASTAT), World Bank, and OECD (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Water productivity, GDP per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Water productivity, GDP per cubic meter of freshwater withdrawal
Unit
constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization (AQUASTAT), World Bank, and OECD (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
179 places, 6,112 data points, 1962–2022
Last refreshed

Water productivity is calculated as total gross domestic product (GDP), measured in constant 2015 US$ divided by annual total water withdrawal.