Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Saudi Arabia: Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
6.5 % change on previous year
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
54.09 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
15th
Saudi Arabia rank
18th

Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Saudi Arabia
0200400600800196919962024

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 54.09 % change on previous year against 6.5 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 47.59 % change on previous year.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 8.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and Saudi Arabia ranks 18th of 31 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 39.83 % change on previous year 3.76 % change on previous year 36.07 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 6.82 % change on previous year 31.94 % change on previous year 25.13 % change on previous year Saudi Arabia
2010s 15.29 % change on previous year 13.91 % change on previous year 1.38 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 25.26 % change on previous year 28.38 % change on previous year 3.13 % change on previous year Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 54.09 % change on previous year against 6.5 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Saudi Arabia?
47.59 % change on previous year, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Saudi Arabia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Saudi Arabia rank globally for wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and Saudi Arabia ranks 18th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Saudi Arabia: Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/wood-pulp-import-value-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/wood-pulp-import-value-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/saudi-arabia/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Saudi Arabia: Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 8,778 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Wood pulp — Import value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.