Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate was 6.5 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 1969–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) is 6.5 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 69.3% on the previous year and up 124.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 861.57 % change on previous year in 1976 and was at its lowest, -66.89 % change on previous year, in 1983.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 31 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1970 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1973 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1974 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1975 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1976 | 861.57 % change on previous year | — |
| 1977 | -23.85 % change on previous year | -102.8% |
| 1978 | 4.99 % change on previous year | -120.9% |
| 1979 | 25.41 % change on previous year | +409.5% |
| 1980 | 39.02 % change on previous year | +53.6% |
| 1981 | 18.95 % change on previous year | -51.5% |
| 1982 | -22 % change on previous year | -216.1% |
| 1983 | -66.89 % change on previous year | +204.1% |
| 1984 | 74.06 % change on previous year | -210.7% |
| 1985 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1986 | 29.36 % change on previous year | — |
| 1987 | -43.27 % change on previous year | -247.3% |
| 1988 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1989 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1993 | 139.9 % change on previous year | — |
| 1994 | 9.41 % change on previous year | -93.3% |
| 1995 | 135.92 % change on previous year | +1343.8% |
| 1996 | -41.12 % change on previous year | -130.3% |
| 1997 | -8.7 % change on previous year | -78.8% |
| 1998 | 52.64 % change on previous year | -705.0% |
| 1999 | -9.26 % change on previous year | -117.6% |
| 2000 | 60.58 % change on previous year | -754.1% |
| 2001 | -5.28 % change on previous year | -108.7% |
| 2002 | 4.31 % change on previous year | -181.7% |
| 2003 | 2.59 % change on previous year | -39.9% |
| 2004 | -2.96 % change on previous year | -214.4% |
| 2005 | 28.86 % change on previous year | -1074.1% |
| 2006 | 19.8 % change on previous year | -31.4% |
| 2007 | -11.34 % change on previous year | -157.3% |
| 2008 | -5.49 % change on previous year | -51.6% |
| 2009 | -22.91 % change on previous year | +317.1% |
| 2010 | 32.27 % change on previous year | -240.8% |
| 2011 | 19.76 % change on previous year | -38.8% |
| 2012 | 7.39 % change on previous year | -62.6% |
| 2013 | 19.42 % change on previous year | +162.8% |
| 2014 | -26.36 % change on previous year | -235.7% |
| 2015 | 35.25 % change on previous year | -233.7% |
| 2016 | -4.09 % change on previous year | -111.6% |
| 2017 | -6.92 % change on previous year | +69.2% |
| 2018 | 60.59 % change on previous year | -976.1% |
| 2019 | 15.55 % change on previous year | -74.3% |
| 2020 | 16.62 % change on previous year | +6.9% |
| 2021 | 48.91 % change on previous year | +194.3% |
| 2022 | 33.1 % change on previous year | -32.3% |
| 2023 | 21.16 % change on previous year | -36.1% |
| 2024 | 6.5 % change on previous year | -69.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 1 |
| 1970s | 86.81 % change on previous year | -23.85 % change on previous year | 861.57 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.92 % change on previous year | -66.89 % change on previous year | 74.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 39.83 % change on previous year | -41.12 % change on previous year | 139.9 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 2000s | 6.82 % change on previous year | -22.91 % change on previous year | 60.58 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 15.29 % change on previous year | -26.36 % change on previous year | 60.59 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 25.26 % change on previous year | 6.5 % change on previous year | 48.91 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- 12 Ukraine 63.56 % change on previous year compare
- 13 Cuba 62.4 % change on previous year compare
- 14 Uzbekistan 62.26 % change on previous year compare
- 15 Turkmenistan 58.57 % change on previous year compare
- 16 Norway 56.07 % change on previous year compare
- 17 Madagascar 55.09 % change on previous year compare
- 17 Türkiye 3.42 % change on previous year compare
- 18 Saudi Arabia 54.09 % change on previous year compare
More environment data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Temperature change 1.74 °C (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.243 °C (2025)
- Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Use per area of cropland 5.4 kg/ha (2024)
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Use per value of agricultural production 15.54 g/Int$ (2024)
- Permanent crops — Area 10,963 1000 ha (2024)
- Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity 835,204 t (2024)
- Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Use per capita 1.56 kg/cap (2024)
- Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Use per value of agricultural 4.32 g/Int$ (2024)
- Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use 923,654 t (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- Wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 6.5 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 861.57 % change on previous year in 1976.
- What is the lowest wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was -66.89 % change on previous year in 1983.
- How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th out of 31 groups with data for 2024.
- Is wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 124.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Wood pulp — Import value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Wood pulp — Import value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Wood pulp — Import value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.