15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered in Central Asia and Southern Asia
Central Asia and Southern Asia: 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered was 15.4 % in 2021. ▬ Flat
15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered in Central Asia and Southern Asia, 2000–2021
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
Central Asia and Southern Asia recorded 15.4 % for 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered in 2021. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is down 0.1% on the previous year and down 0.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered in Central Asia and Southern Asia peaked at 15.54 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 15.4 %, in 2021.
Central Asia and Southern Asia ranks 16th of 21 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered in Central Asia and Southern Asia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 15.54 % | — |
| 2005 | 15.48 % | -0.4% |
| 2010 | 15.5 % | +0.1% |
| 2015 | 15.44 % | -0.4% |
| 2018 | 15.42 % | -0.1% |
| 2021 | 15.4 % | -0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.51 % | 15.48 % | 15.54 % | 2 |
| 2010s | 15.45 % | 15.42 % | 15.5 % | 3 |
| 2020s | 15.4 % | 15.4 % | 15.4 % | 1 |
Countries ranked near Central Asia and Southern Asia
- 13 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 29.07 % compare
- 13 Guadeloupe 95.52 % compare
- 14 Papua New Guinea 94.4 % compare
- 14 Syrian Arab Republic 3.53 % compare
- 15 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 1.78 % compare
- 15 Vanuatu 93.97 % compare
- 16 Cuba 93.6 % compare
- 17 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 93.55 % compare
- 18 Martinique 92.9 % compare
- 19 Guyana 92.53 % compare
More environment data for Central Asia and Southern Asia
- Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services 95 % (2024)
- Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services 77 % (2024)
- 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Industries) — Value 41.86 USD/m3 (2023)
- 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value 31.63 USD/m3 (2023)
- 6.4.2 Level of water stress (No breakdown) — Value 67.81 % (2023)
- 6.4.2 Level of water stress (Agriculture (ISIC4 A01 A0210 A0322)) 61.36 % (2023)
- 6.4.2 Level of water stress (Services (G to T)) — Value 4.71 % (2023)
- 6.4.2 Level of water stress (Industries) — Value 1.74 % (2023)
- 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (No breakdown) — Value 3.79 USD/m3 (2023)
- 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Agriculture (ISIC4 A01 A0210 A0322)) 0.58 USD/m3 (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered in Central Asia and Southern Asia?
- 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered in Central Asia and Southern Asia was 15.4 % in 2021, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered recorded in Central Asia and Southern Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 15.54 % in 2000.
- What is the lowest 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered recorded in Central Asia and Southern Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 15.4 % in 2021.
- How does Central Asia and Southern Asia rank for 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered?
- Central Asia and Southern Asia ranks 16th out of 21 groups with data for 2021.
- Is 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered rising or falling in Central Asia and Southern Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Central Asia and Southern Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered areas — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.