6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Industries) — Value in Republic of Korea

Republic of Korea: 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Industries) — Value was 131.28 USD/m3 in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
131.28 USD/m3
Change on year
down 0.7%
World rank
56th
of 161 countries
All-time high
132.23 USD/m3
in 2022
All-time low
63.5 USD/m3
in 2001
Years of data
24
2000–2023

6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Industries) — Value in Republic of Korea, 2000–2023

0501001502000201120232000: 67.1 USD/m32001: 63.5 USD/m32002: 64 USD/m32003: 66.7 USD/m32004: 74.3 USD/m32005: 76.4 USD/m32006: 79.1 USD/m32007: 83.9 USD/m32008: 85.8 USD/m32009: 86.9 USD/m32010: 96.7 USD/m32011: 102.4 USD/m32012: 104.2 USD/m32013: 108.6 USD/m32014: 110.3 USD/m32015: 112.8 USD/m32016: 116.6 USD/m32017: 123.5 USD/m32018: 126.2 USD/m32019: 123.8 USD/m32020: 120.5 USD/m32021: 127.3 USD/m32022: 132.2 USD/m32023: 131.3 USD/m3

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in USD/m3.

Analysis

The most recent figure for 6.4.1 water use efficiency (industries) — value in Republic of Korea is 131.28 USD/m3, measured in 2023.

The figure is down 0.7% on the previous year and up 20.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 6.4.1 water use efficiency (industries) — value in Republic of Korea peaked at 132.23 USD/m3 in 2022 and was at its lowest, 63.5 USD/m3, in 2001.

That places Republic of Korea 56th out of 161 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 74.77 USD/m3 63.5 USD/m3 86.93 USD/m3 10
2010s 112.51 USD/m3 96.69 USD/m3 126.22 USD/m3 10
2020s 127.84 USD/m3 120.49 USD/m3 132.23 USD/m3 4

Countries ranked near Republic of Korea

  1. 53 Tunisia 139.11 USD/m3 compare
  2. 54 Morocco 135.92 USD/m3 compare
  3. 55 Slovak Republic 132.82 USD/m3 compare
  4. 57 Lithuania 130.59 USD/m3 compare
  5. 58 Kenya 129.55 USD/m3 compare
  6. 59 Japan 120.44 USD/m3 compare

See the full ranking of 204 places →

More environment data for Republic of Korea

All data for Republic of Korea →

Frequently asked questions

What is 6.4.1 water use efficiency (industries) — value in Republic of Korea?
6.4.1 water use efficiency (industries) — value in Republic of Korea was 131.28 USD/m3 in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 6.4.1 water use efficiency (industries) — value recorded in Republic of Korea?
The highest recorded value was 132.23 USD/m3 in 2022.
What is the lowest 6.4.1 water use efficiency (industries) — value recorded in Republic of Korea?
The lowest recorded value was 63.5 USD/m3 in 2001.
How does Republic of Korea rank for 6.4.1 water use efficiency (industries) — value?
Republic of Korea ranks 56th out of 161 countries with data for 2023.
Is 6.4.1 water use efficiency (industries) — value rising or falling in Republic of Korea?
Over the last ten years it is up 20.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Republic of Korea data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Industries) — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Industries) — Value in Republic of Korea. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/6-4-1-water-use-efficiency-industries-value/republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/6-4-1-water-use-efficiency-industries-value/republic-of-korea/">6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Industries) — Value in Republic of Korea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Industries) — Value
Unit
USD/m3
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 4,771 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.