Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological in Latvia

Latvia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological was 1,334 Hectares in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
1,334 Hectares
Change on year
up 1.1%
World rank
41st
of 47 countries
All-time high
1,334 Hectares
in 2020
All-time low
957 Hectares
in 2003
Years of data
21
2000–2020

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological in Latvia, 2000–2020

05001.0k1.5k2000201020202000: 970 Hectares2001: 958 Hectares2002: 973 Hectares2003: 957 Hectares2004: 1.0k Hectares2005: 1.1k Hectares2006: 1.2k Hectares2007: 1.2k Hectares2008: 1.2k Hectares2009: 1.2k Hectares2010: 1.2k Hectares2011: 1.2k Hectares2012: 1.2k Hectares2013: 1.2k Hectares2014: 1.2k Hectares2015: 1.2k Hectares2016: 1.3k Hectares2017: 1.3k Hectares2018: 1.3k Hectares2019: 1.3k Hectares2020: 1.3k Hectares

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Hectares.

Analysis

The most recent figure for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological in Latvia is 1,334 Hectares, measured in 2020. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.1% on the previous year and up 13.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological in Latvia peaked at 1,334 Hectares in 2020 and was at its lowest, 957 Hectares, in 2003.

Latvia ranks 41st of 47 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land in Latvia, 2000 to 2020.
Year Hectares Change
2000 970 Hectares —
2001 958 Hectares -1.2%
2002 973 Hectares +1.6%
2003 957 Hectares -1.6%
2004 1,009 Hectares +5.4%
2005 1,092 Hectares +8.2%
2006 1,205 Hectares +10.3%
2007 1,188 Hectares -1.4%
2008 1,170 Hectares -1.5%
2009 1,168 Hectares -0.2%
2010 1,173 Hectares +0.4%
2011 1,158 Hectares -1.3%
2012 1,178 Hectares +1.7%
2013 1,208 Hectares +2.5%
2014 1,209 Hectares +0.1%
2015 1,230 Hectares +1.7%
2016 1,288 Hectares +4.7%
2017 1,290 Hectares +0.2%
2018 1,295 Hectares +0.4%
2019 1,319 Hectares +1.9%
2020 1,334 Hectares +1.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 1,069 Hectares 957 Hectares 1,205 Hectares 10
2010s 1,235 Hectares 1,158 Hectares 1,319 Hectares 10
2020s 1,334 Hectares 1,334 Hectares 1,334 Hectares 1

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 38 Belarus 5,660 Hectares compare
  2. 39 Mozambique 5,650 Hectares compare
  3. 39 Syrian Arab Republic 4,662 Hectares compare
  4. 40 Lithuania 2,249 Hectares compare
  5. 40 Philippines 5,590 Hectares compare
  6. 41 Chad 5,200 Hectares compare
  7. 42 Iraq 5,000 Hectares compare
  8. 42 Netherlands 1,005 Hectares compare
  9. 43 Angola 4,900 Hectares compare
  10. 43 Estonia 694 Hectares compare
  11. 44 Colombia 4,878 Hectares compare

See the full ranking of 242 places →

More environment data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological in Latvia?
Africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological in Latvia was 1,334 Hectares in 2020, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
What is the highest africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 1,334 Hectares in 2020.
What is the lowest africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 957 Hectares in 2003.
How does Latvia rank for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Latvia ranks 41st out of 47 countries with data for 2020.
Is africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is up 13.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological in Latvia. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/latvia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/latvia-2/">Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.