Statizoid

Freshwater Fish — Other uses in Hungary

Hungary: Freshwater Fish — Other uses was 0 1000 t in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
World rank
5th
of 135 countries
All-time high
0 1000 t
in 2010
All-time low
0 1000 t
in 2010
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Freshwater Fish — Other uses in Hungary, 2010–2023

00.20.40.60.812010201620232010: 0 1000 t2011: 0 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: 0 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: 0 1000 t2017: 0 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t2019: 0 1000 t2020: 0 1000 t2021: 0 1000 t2022: 0 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

In 2023, freshwater fish — other uses in Hungary stood at 0 1000 t. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.

Over the whole period, freshwater fish — other uses in Hungary peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2010.

That places Hungary 5th out of 135 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 10
2020s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Hungary

  1. 3 Romania 3 1000 t compare
  2. 4 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 1 1000 t compare
  3. 5 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  4. 5 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  5. 5 Bahrain 0 1000 t compare
  6. 5 Lesotho 0 1000 t compare
  7. 5 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  8. 5 Comoros 0 1000 t compare
  9. 5 Mauritania 0 1000 t compare
  10. 5 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  11. 5 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
  12. 5 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  13. 5 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  14. 5 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  15. 5 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  16. 5 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  17. 5 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  18. 5 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  19. 5 Armenia 0 1000 t compare
  20. 5 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  21. 5 Uzbekistan 0 1000 t compare
  22. 5 Eswatini 0 1000 t compare
  23. 5 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  24. 5 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
  25. 5 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  26. 5 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t compare
  27. 5 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  28. 5 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  29. 5 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
  30. 5 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  31. 5 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  32. 5 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  33. 5 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  34. 5 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
  35. 5 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  36. 5 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  37. 5 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  38. 5 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  39. 5 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  40. 5 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  41. 5 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  42. 5 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
  43. 5 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  44. 5 Slovak Republic 0 1000 t compare
  45. 5 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  46. 5 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  47. 5 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
  48. 5 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  49. 5 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  50. 5 Serbia 0 1000 t compare
  51. 5 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  52. 5 Croatia 0 1000 t compare
  53. 5 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  54. 5 Latvia 0 1000 t compare
  55. 5 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  56. 5 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  57. 5 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  58. 5 Czechia 0 1000 t compare
  59. 5 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  60. 5 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  61. 5 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  62. 5 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
  63. 5 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  64. 5 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  65. 5 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  66. 5 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  67. 5 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  68. 5 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  69. 5 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  70. 5 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  71. 5 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  72. 5 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  73. 5 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  74. 5 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  75. 5 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  76. 5 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  77. 5 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  78. 5 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  79. 5 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  80. 5 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  81. 5 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  82. 5 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  83. 5 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  84. 5 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  85. 5 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  86. 5 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  87. 5 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  88. 5 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  89. 5 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
  90. 5 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  91. 5 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t compare
  92. 5 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  93. 5 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  94. 5 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
  95. 5 France 0 1000 t compare
  96. 5 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  97. 5 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  98. 5 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  99. 5 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  100. 5 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  101. 5 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  102. 5 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  103. 5 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  104. 5 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  105. 5 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  106. 5 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  107. 5 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  108. 5 India 0 1000 t compare
  109. 5 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  110. 5 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  111. 5 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  112. 5 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  113. 5 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  114. 5 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  115. 5 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  116. 5 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  117. 5 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  118. 5 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  119. 5 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  120. 5 Kenya 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 166 places →

More environment data for Hungary

All data for Hungary →

Frequently asked questions

What is freshwater fish — other uses in Hungary?
Freshwater fish — other uses in Hungary was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest freshwater fish — other uses recorded in Hungary?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
What is the lowest freshwater fish — other uses recorded in Hungary?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
How does Hungary rank for freshwater fish — other uses?
Hungary ranks 5th out of 135 countries with data for 2023.
Where does this Hungary data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Freshwater Fish — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Freshwater Fish — Other uses in Hungary. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/freshwater-fish-other-uses-non-food/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/freshwater-fish-other-uses-non-food/hungary/">Freshwater Fish — Other uses in Hungary</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Freshwater Fish — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
166 places, 2,038 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.