Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham

Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham: Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly was -9.79 Percentage change in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)
-9.79 Percentage change
Change on year
down 414.3%
Rank
2860th
of 3112 regions
All-time high
67.51 Percentage change
in 1980
All-time low
-16.25 Percentage change
in 1990
Years of data
76
1950–2025

Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham, 1950–2025

-200204060195019872025

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage change.

Analysis

In 2025, historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham stood at -9.79 Percentage change.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 414.3% on the previous year and down 542.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham peaked at 67.51 Percentage change in 1980 and was at its lowest, -16.25 Percentage change, in 1990.

That places Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham 2860th out of 3112 regions with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham, year by year

Annual values for Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham, 1950 to 2025.
Year Percentage change Change
1950 41.34 Percentage change
1951 52.05 Percentage change +25.9%
1952 45.21 Percentage change -13.1%
1953 52.15 Percentage change +15.3%
1954 47.57 Percentage change -8.8%
1955 32.97 Percentage change -30.7%
1956 34.92 Percentage change +5.9%
1957 30.77 Percentage change -11.9%
1958 58.69 Percentage change +90.7%
1959 30.51 Percentage change -48.0%
1960 50.58 Percentage change +65.8%
1961 25.99 Percentage change -48.6%
1962 41.02 Percentage change +57.9%
1963 50.45 Percentage change +23.0%
1964 35.67 Percentage change -29.3%
1965 43.94 Percentage change +23.2%
1966 54.44 Percentage change +23.9%
1967 53.23 Percentage change -2.2%
1968 62.08 Percentage change +16.6%
1969 49.43 Percentage change -20.4%
1970 51.12 Percentage change +3.4%
1971 56.18 Percentage change +9.9%
1972 51.9 Percentage change -7.6%
1973 49.85 Percentage change -3.9%
1974 48.67 Percentage change -2.4%
1975 40.25 Percentage change -17.3%
1976 36.17 Percentage change -10.1%
1977 53.1 Percentage change +46.8%
1978 51.78 Percentage change -2.5%
1979 57.34 Percentage change +10.7%
1980 67.51 Percentage change +17.7%
1981 9.61 Percentage change -85.8%
1982 2.58 Percentage change -73.1%
1983 -0.6236 Percentage change -124.1%
1984 -5.72 Percentage change +817.0%
1985 5.02 Percentage change -187.7%
1986 2.84 Percentage change -43.4%
1987 7.92 Percentage change +178.8%
1988 4.01 Percentage change -49.4%
1989 -12.43 Percentage change -409.8%
1990 -16.25 Percentage change +30.8%
1991 0.9833 Percentage change -106.1%
1992 3.46 Percentage change +251.9%
1993 1.5 Percentage change -56.8%
1994 3.18 Percentage change +112.5%
1995 -12.9 Percentage change -505.9%
1996 -4.26 Percentage change -66.9%
1997 -9.71 Percentage change +127.7%
1998 4.62 Percentage change -147.5%
1999 -0.6601 Percentage change -114.3%
2000 8.85 Percentage change -1440.9%
2001 3.15 Percentage change -64.4%
2002 1.71 Percentage change -45.9%
2003 -5.98 Percentage change -450.9%
2004 -0.1276 Percentage change -97.9%
2005 4.47 Percentage change -3602.6%
2006 1.76 Percentage change -60.7%
2007 5.49 Percentage change +213.0%
2008 7.97 Percentage change +45.0%
2009 -9.11 Percentage change -214.4%
2010 -1.33 Percentage change -85.4%
2011 -13.19 Percentage change +893.6%
2012 5.7 Percentage change -143.2%
2013 2.04 Percentage change -64.2%
2014 3.9 Percentage change +91.0%
2015 2.21 Percentage change -43.4%
2016 -1.23 Percentage change -155.6%
2017 2.6 Percentage change -311.0%
2018 -1.86 Percentage change -171.7%
2019 -3.37 Percentage change +81.2%
2020 -2.24 Percentage change -33.6%
2021 6.62 Percentage change -396.1%
2022 -3.23 Percentage change -148.7%
2023 2.22 Percentage change -169.0%
2024 3.11 Percentage change +40.0%
2025 -9.79 Percentage change -414.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1950s 42.62 Percentage change 30.51 Percentage change 58.69 Percentage change 10
1960s 46.68 Percentage change 25.99 Percentage change 62.08 Percentage change 10
1970s 49.64 Percentage change 36.17 Percentage change 57.34 Percentage change 10
1980s 8.07 Percentage change -12.43 Percentage change 67.51 Percentage change 10
1990s -3.01 Percentage change -16.25 Percentage change 4.62 Percentage change 10
2000s 1.82 Percentage change -9.11 Percentage change 8.85 Percentage change 10
2010s -0.4526 Percentage change -13.19 Percentage change 5.7 Percentage change 10
2020s -0.5482 Percentage change -9.79 Percentage change 6.62 Percentage change 6

Frequently asked questions

What is historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham?
Historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham was -9.79 Percentage change in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
What is the highest historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly recorded in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham?
The highest recorded value was 67.51 Percentage change in 1980.
What is the lowest historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly recorded in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham?
The lowest recorded value was -16.25 Percentage change in 1990.
How does Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham rank for historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly?
Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham ranks 2860th out of 3112 regions with data for 2025.
Is historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly rising or falling in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham?
Over the last ten years it is down 542.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham data come from?
The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 76 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/historical-exposure-to-drought-land-soil-moisture-anomaly/kensington-and-chelsea-and-hammersmith-and-fulham/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/historical-exposure-to-drought-land-soil-moisture-anomaly/kensington-and-chelsea-and-hammersmith-and-fulham/">Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly in Kensington and Chelsea, and Hammersmith and Fulham</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
3,375 places, 256,500 data points, 1950–2025
Last refreshed

The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org