Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly in Richmond - Tweed
Richmond - Tweed: Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly was 6.65 Percentage change in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly in Richmond - Tweed, 1950–2025
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage change.
Analysis
Richmond - Tweed recorded 6.65 Percentage change for historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly in 2025.
The figure is down 39.3% on the previous year and down 23.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly in Richmond - Tweed peaked at 14.86 Percentage change in 1999 and was at its lowest, -21.09 Percentage change, in 1968.
Richmond - Tweed ranks 97th of 3112 regions on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly in Richmond - Tweed, year by year
| Year | Percentage change | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 8.88 Percentage change | — |
| 1951 | -14.07 Percentage change | -258.5% |
| 1952 | -15.54 Percentage change | +10.5% |
| 1953 | -13.62 Percentage change | -12.4% |
| 1954 | -1.96 Percentage change | -85.6% |
| 1955 | -3.55 Percentage change | +80.7% |
| 1956 | 1.47 Percentage change | -141.4% |
| 1957 | -11.2 Percentage change | -861.1% |
| 1958 | -11.75 Percentage change | +4.9% |
| 1959 | 3.18 Percentage change | -127.1% |
| 1960 | -11.14 Percentage change | -449.9% |
| 1961 | -11.51 Percentage change | +3.3% |
| 1962 | -4.61 Percentage change | -60.0% |
| 1963 | 8.11 Percentage change | -276.0% |
| 1964 | -0.2098 Percentage change | -102.6% |
| 1965 | -8.75 Percentage change | +4069.2% |
| 1966 | -8.77 Percentage change | +0.3% |
| 1967 | 0.1552 Percentage change | -101.8% |
| 1968 | -21.09 Percentage change | -13695.6% |
| 1969 | -8.94 Percentage change | -57.6% |
| 1970 | -7.85 Percentage change | -12.2% |
| 1971 | -1.28 Percentage change | -83.6% |
| 1972 | 3.84 Percentage change | -399.1% |
| 1973 | -0.5978 Percentage change | -115.6% |
| 1974 | 6.85 Percentage change | -1245.8% |
| 1975 | 0.8981 Percentage change | -86.9% |
| 1976 | 10.61 Percentage change | +1081.4% |
| 1977 | -9.44 Percentage change | -188.9% |
| 1978 | 4.66 Percentage change | -149.4% |
| 1979 | 0.4433 Percentage change | -90.5% |
| 1980 | -12.15 Percentage change | -2840.2% |
| 1981 | 0.211 Percentage change | -101.7% |
| 1982 | -3.37 Percentage change | -1695.3% |
| 1983 | 9.87 Percentage change | -393.1% |
| 1984 | 6.67 Percentage change | -32.4% |
| 1985 | 6.13 Percentage change | -8.0% |
| 1986 | -7.2 Percentage change | -217.4% |
| 1987 | 0.0851 Percentage change | -101.2% |
| 1988 | 6.33 Percentage change | +7336.2% |
| 1989 | 8.29 Percentage change | +31.0% |
| 1990 | 1.56 Percentage change | -81.1% |
| 1991 | -14.69 Percentage change | -1039.2% |
| 1992 | 6.39 Percentage change | -143.5% |
| 1993 | -7.38 Percentage change | -215.6% |
| 1994 | -5.76 Percentage change | -22.0% |
| 1995 | -11.25 Percentage change | +95.4% |
| 1996 | 6.11 Percentage change | -154.3% |
| 1997 | 5.46 Percentage change | -10.7% |
| 1998 | 3.02 Percentage change | -44.6% |
| 1999 | 14.86 Percentage change | +391.5% |
| 2000 | -4.99 Percentage change | -133.6% |
| 2001 | -0.4101 Percentage change | -91.8% |
| 2002 | -11.73 Percentage change | +2760.3% |
| 2003 | -2.91 Percentage change | -75.2% |
| 2004 | -8.05 Percentage change | +176.4% |
| 2005 | -6.4 Percentage change | -20.5% |
| 2006 | -0.2053 Percentage change | -96.8% |
| 2007 | -5.79 Percentage change | +2720.7% |
| 2008 | 4.37 Percentage change | -175.4% |
| 2009 | -1.49 Percentage change | -134.1% |
| 2010 | 12.26 Percentage change | -923.4% |
| 2011 | 10.05 Percentage change | -18.1% |
| 2012 | 4 Percentage change | -60.2% |
| 2013 | 6.12 Percentage change | +52.8% |
| 2014 | -11.16 Percentage change | -282.4% |
| 2015 | 8.66 Percentage change | -177.6% |
| 2016 | -4.63 Percentage change | -153.5% |
| 2017 | -6.47 Percentage change | +39.7% |
| 2018 | 0.1717 Percentage change | -102.7% |
| 2019 | -20.45 Percentage change | -12010.9% |
| 2020 | -7.62 Percentage change | -62.7% |
| 2021 | 9.58 Percentage change | -225.8% |
| 2022 | 14.8 Percentage change | +54.5% |
| 2023 | -6.05 Percentage change | -140.9% |
| 2024 | 10.96 Percentage change | -281.3% |
| 2025 | 6.65 Percentage change | -39.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -5.82 Percentage change | -15.54 Percentage change | 8.88 Percentage change | 10 |
| 1960s | -6.67 Percentage change | -21.09 Percentage change | 8.11 Percentage change | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.8139 Percentage change | -9.44 Percentage change | 10.61 Percentage change | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.49 Percentage change | -12.15 Percentage change | 9.87 Percentage change | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.1673 Percentage change | -14.69 Percentage change | 14.86 Percentage change | 10 |
| 2000s | -3.76 Percentage change | -11.73 Percentage change | 4.37 Percentage change | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.1444 Percentage change | -20.45 Percentage change | 12.26 Percentage change | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.72 Percentage change | -7.62 Percentage change | 14.8 Percentage change | 6 |
Countries ranked near Richmond - Tweed
- 94 Namibia -2.99 Percentage change compare
- 95 Haiti -3.01 Percentage change compare
- 96 Antigua and Barbuda -3.03 Percentage change compare
- 97 Jersey -3.05 Percentage change compare
- 98 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of -3.12 Percentage change compare
- 99 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland -3.13 Percentage change compare
- 100 El Salvador -3.31 Percentage change compare
More environment data for Richmond - Tweed
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly 6.21 Percentage change (2025)
- River flooding exposure — Cropland share exposed to river flooding 12.89 Percentage of agricultural land area (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly in Richmond - Tweed?
- Historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly in Richmond - Tweed was 6.65 Percentage change in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- What is the highest historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly recorded in Richmond - Tweed?
- The highest recorded value was 14.86 Percentage change in 1999.
- What is the lowest historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly recorded in Richmond - Tweed?
- The lowest recorded value was -21.09 Percentage change in 1968.
- How does Richmond - Tweed rank for historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly?
- Richmond - Tweed ranks 97th out of 3112 regions with data for 2025.
- Is historical exposure to drought — land soil moisture anomaly rising or falling in Richmond - Tweed?
- Over the last ten years it is down 23.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Richmond - Tweed data come from?
- The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 76 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org