Land use hidden — Total area, per unit of GDP in Cuba

Cuba: Land use hidden — Total area, per unit of GDP was 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in 2020. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2020)
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
Change on year
down 3.7%
World rank
109th
of 178 countries
All-time high
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 1970
All-time low
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Years of data
51
1970–2020

Land use hidden — Total area, per unit of GDP in Cuba, 1970–2020

00000197019952020

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in Square kilometres per US$ of GDP.

Analysis

The most recent figure for land use hidden — total area, per unit of gdp in Cuba is 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP, measured in 2020. That is the lowest value across all 51 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.7% on the previous year and down 44.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, land use hidden — total area, per unit of gdp in Cuba peaked at 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in 1970 and was at its lowest, 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP, in 2020.

That places Cuba 109th out of 178 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Land use hidden — Total area, per unit of GDP in Cuba, year by year

Annual values for Land use hidden — Total area, per unit of GDP in Cuba, 1970 to 2020.
Year Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Change
1970 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP —
1971 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -17.7%
1972 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -15.0%
1973 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -18.5%
1974 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -12.4%
1975 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -12.4%
1976 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -5.5%
1977 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -2.9%
1978 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -20.4%
1979 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -8.9%
1980 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -1.6%
1981 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -1.2%
1982 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -3.8%
1983 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -5.6%
1984 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -7.6%
1985 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP +4.9%
1986 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -5.4%
1987 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -3.9%
1988 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -8.2%
1989 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP +1.6%
1990 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -5.7%
1991 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP +17.8%
1992 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP +10.1%
1993 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -1.3%
1994 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -21.4%
1995 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -6.5%
1996 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP +21.6%
1997 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -1.4%
1998 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -1.4%
1999 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -9.3%
2000 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -7.2%
2001 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -3.5%
2002 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -5.7%
2003 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -6.4%
2004 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -6.0%
2005 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -10.4%
2006 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -12.7%
2007 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -10.0%
2008 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -3.6%
2009 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -2.1%
2010 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -3.5%
2011 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -13.7%
2012 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -5.7%
2013 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -5.2%
2014 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -4.3%
2015 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -7.4%
2016 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -4.6%
2017 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -5.7%
2018 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -3.2%
2019 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -3.3%
2020 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP -3.7%

Cuba compared with similar countries

  • Cuba's 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP, 64% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
  • Cuba's 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP, 96% of the median. (38 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 10
1980s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 10
1990s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 10
2000s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 10
2010s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 10
2020s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 1

Countries ranked near Cuba

  1. 106 Bulgaria 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP compare
  2. 107 New Zealand 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP compare
  3. 108 Guatemala 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP compare
  4. 110 Thailand 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP compare
  5. 111 India 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP compare
  6. 112 Sweden 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP compare

See the full ranking of 178 places →

More environment data for Cuba

All data for Cuba →

Frequently asked questions

What is land use hidden — total area, per unit of gdp in Cuba?
Land use hidden — total area, per unit of gdp in Cuba was 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest land use hidden — total area, per unit of gdp recorded in Cuba?
The highest recorded value was 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in 1970.
What is the lowest land use hidden — total area, per unit of gdp recorded in Cuba?
The lowest recorded value was 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in 2020.
How does Cuba rank for land use hidden — total area, per unit of gdp?
Cuba ranks 109th out of 178 countries with data for 2020.
Is land use hidden — total area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Cuba?
Over the last ten years it is down 44.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Cuba data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Land use hidden — Total area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land use hidden — Total area, per unit of GDP in Cuba. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/land-use-hidden-total-area-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/land-use-hidden-total-area-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/">Land use hidden — Total area, per unit of GDP in Cuba</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Land use hidden — Total area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Land use hidden — Total area ÷ GDP (current US$)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Total area, per unit of GDP
Unit
Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,530 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Total area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.