Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency in Cuba
Cuba: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency was 64.73 % in 2023. ▲ Rising
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency in Cuba, 1961–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency in Cuba is 64.73 %, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 20.5% on the previous year and down 13.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency in Cuba peaked at 157.59 % in 2004 and was at its lowest, 26.99 %, in 1969.
That places Cuba 105th out of 186 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency in Cuba, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 78.62 % | — |
| 1962 | 51.13 % | -35.0% |
| 1963 | 33.84 % | -33.8% |
| 1964 | 32.03 % | -5.3% |
| 1965 | 38.53 % | +20.3% |
| 1966 | 28.5 % | -26.0% |
| 1967 | 33.21 % | +16.5% |
| 1968 | 30.16 % | -9.2% |
| 1969 | 26.99 % | -10.5% |
| 1970 | 54.66 % | +102.5% |
| 1971 | 50.5 % | -7.6% |
| 1972 | 55.08 % | +9.1% |
| 1973 | 56.63 % | +2.8% |
| 1974 | 52.98 % | -6.4% |
| 1975 | 51.77 % | -2.3% |
| 1976 | 56.77 % | +9.7% |
| 1977 | 63.22 % | +11.4% |
| 1978 | 67.75 % | +7.2% |
| 1979 | 71.25 % | +5.2% |
| 1980 | 54.15 % | -24.0% |
| 1981 | 51.61 % | -4.7% |
| 1982 | 56.88 % | +10.2% |
| 1983 | 55.49 % | -2.4% |
| 1984 | 57.29 % | +3.2% |
| 1985 | 54.55 % | -4.8% |
| 1986 | 52.19 % | -4.3% |
| 1987 | 52.65 % | +0.9% |
| 1988 | 54.88 % | +4.2% |
| 1989 | 62.37 % | +13.6% |
| 1990 | 62.62 % | +0.4% |
| 1991 | 69.72 % | +11.3% |
| 1992 | 105.31 % | +51.0% |
| 1993 | 68.64 % | -34.8% |
| 1994 | 82.56 % | +20.3% |
| 1995 | 44.83 % | -45.7% |
| 1996 | 64.77 % | +44.5% |
| 1997 | 66.94 % | +3.3% |
| 1998 | 88.61 % | +32.4% |
| 1999 | 81.84 % | -7.6% |
| 2000 | 88.78 % | +8.5% |
| 2001 | 80.82 % | -9.0% |
| 2002 | 110 % | +36.1% |
| 2003 | 113.02 % | +2.7% |
| 2004 | 157.59 % | +39.4% |
| 2005 | 88.44 % | -43.9% |
| 2006 | 55.9 % | -36.8% |
| 2007 | 68.64 % | +22.8% |
| 2008 | 60.98 % | -11.2% |
| 2009 | 85.84 % | +40.8% |
| 2010 | 64.08 % | -25.3% |
| 2011 | 70.4 % | +9.9% |
| 2012 | 72.32 % | +2.7% |
| 2013 | 75.13 % | +3.9% |
| 2014 | 78.49 % | +4.5% |
| 2015 | 66.88 % | -14.8% |
| 2016 | 79.14 % | +18.3% |
| 2017 | 83.48 % | +5.5% |
| 2018 | 77.81 % | -6.8% |
| 2019 | 89.46 % | +15.0% |
| 2020 | 100.63 % | +12.5% |
| 2021 | 86.12 % | -14.4% |
| 2022 | 81.4 % | -5.5% |
| 2023 | 64.73 % | -20.5% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 64.73 % is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 67.89 %, 95% of the median. (51 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 64.73 % is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 54.12 %, 1.2× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970 | +102.5% | 26.99 % | 54.66 % |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 39.23 % | 26.99 % | 78.62 % | 9 |
| 1970s | 58.06 % | 50.5 % | 71.25 % | 10 |
| 1980s | 55.21 % | 51.61 % | 62.37 % | 10 |
| 1990s | 73.58 % | 44.83 % | 105.31 % | 10 |
| 2000s | 91 % | 55.9 % | 157.59 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 75.72 % | 64.08 % | 89.46 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 83.22 % | 64.73 % | 100.63 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More environment data for Cuba
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -5.3 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -5.17 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.278 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.4 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 2.52 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate -1.97 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency in Cuba?
- Nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency in Cuba was 64.73 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 157.59 % in 2004.
- What is the lowest nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 26.99 % in 1969.
- How does Cuba rank for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Cuba ranks 105th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 13.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).