Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Australia and New Zealand
Australia and New Zealand: Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services was 100 % in 2024. ▬ Flat
Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2024, percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Australia and New Zealand stood at 100 %. That is the highest value across all 25 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Australia and New Zealand peaked at 100 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 100 %, in 2000.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st of 186 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Australia and New Zealand, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 100 % | — |
| 2001 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 100 % | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 100 % | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % | 5 |
Countries ranked near Australia and New Zealand
- 1 American Samoa 100 % compare
- 1 Andorra 100 % compare
- 1 Armenia 100 % compare
- 1 Australia 100 % compare
- 1 Austria 100 % compare
- 1 Bahrain 100 % compare
- 1 Belarus 100 % compare
- 1 Belgium 100 % compare
- 1 Bermuda 100 % compare
- 1 Bhutan 100 % compare
- 1 Brazil 100 % compare
- 1 Brunei Darussalam 100 % compare
- 1 China, Hong Kong SAR 100 % compare
- 1 China, Macao SAR 100 % compare
- 1 Cook Islands 100 % compare
- 1 Costa Rica 100 % compare
- 1 Croatia 100 % compare
- 1 Cyprus 100 % compare
- 1 Denmark 100 % compare
- 1 Estonia 100 % compare
- 1 Finland 100 % compare
- 1 France 100 % compare
- 1 French Polynesia 100 % compare
- 1 Germany 100 % compare
- 1 Greece 100 % compare
- 1 Greenland 100 % compare
- 1 Hungary 100 % compare
- 1 Iceland 100 % compare
- 1 Israel 100 % compare
- 1 Italy 100 % compare
- 1 Kuwait 100 % compare
- 1 Lithuania 100 % compare
- 1 Luxembourg 100 % compare
- 1 Maldives 100 % compare
- 1 Malta 100 % compare
- 1 Mauritius 100 % compare
- 1 Mexico 100 % compare
- 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 100 % compare
- 1 New Caledonia 100 % compare
- 1 New Zealand 100 % compare
- 1 Norway 100 % compare
- 1 Palau 100 % compare
- 1 Paraguay 100 % compare
- 1 Puerto Rico 100 % compare
- 1 Qatar 100 % compare
- 1 Republic of Korea 100 % compare
- 1 Romania 100 % compare
- 1 Singapore 100 % compare
- 1 Slovakia 100 % compare
- 1 Slovenia 100 % compare
- 1 Spain 100 % compare
- 1 Sweden 100 % compare
- 1 Switzerland 100 % compare
- 1 Thailand 100 % compare
- 1 Tokelau 100 % compare
- 1 Turkmenistan 100 % compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 100 % compare
- 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 100 % compare
- 1 Uruguay 100 % compare
- 4 Türkiye 96 % compare
More environment data for Australia and New Zealand
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -5.87 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -4.39 Percentage change (2025)
- Temperature change 1.39 °C (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.335 °C (2025)
- Total fibre furnish — Production 4.99 million t (2024)
- Recovered paper — Production 2.98 million t (2024)
- Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area 187.5 USD_PPP/ha (2024)
- Arable land — Area 31,787 1000 ha (2024)
- Cropland — Area per capita 1.01 ha/cap (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Australia and New Zealand?
- Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Australia and New Zealand was 100 % in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 100 % in 2000.
- What is the lowest percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 100 % in 2000.
- How does Australia and New Zealand rank for percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st out of 186 countries with data for 2024.
- Is percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services rising or falling in Australia and New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Australia and New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services (percent) — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.