Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Türkiye
Türkiye: Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services was 96 % in 2024. ▬ Flat
Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Türkiye, 2000–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
Türkiye recorded 96 % for percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in 2024. That is the highest value across all 25 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Türkiye peaked at 96 % in 2017 and was at its lowest, 92 %, in 2000.
Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Türkiye, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 92 % | — |
| 2001 | 93 % | +1.1% |
| 2002 | 93 % | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 93 % | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 93 % | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 93 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 94 % | +1.1% |
| 2007 | 94 % | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 94 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 94 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 94 % | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 94 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 95 % | +1.1% |
| 2013 | 95 % | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 95 % | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 95 % | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 95 % | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 96 % | +1.1% |
| 2018 | 96 % | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 96 % | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 96 % | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 96 % | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 96 % | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 96 % | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 96 % | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.3 % | 92 % | 94 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 95.1 % | 94 % | 96 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 96 % | 96 % | 96 % | 5 |
Countries ranked near Türkiye
- 1 American Samoa 100 % compare
- 1 Andorra 100 % compare
- 1 Armenia 100 % compare
- 1 Australia 100 % compare
- 1 Austria 100 % compare
- 1 Bahrain 100 % compare
- 1 Belarus 100 % compare
- 1 Belgium 100 % compare
- 1 Bermuda 100 % compare
- 1 Bhutan 100 % compare
- 1 Brazil 100 % compare
- 1 Brunei Darussalam 100 % compare
- 1 China, Hong Kong SAR 100 % compare
- 1 China, Macao SAR 100 % compare
- 1 Cook Islands 100 % compare
- 1 Costa Rica 100 % compare
- 1 Croatia 100 % compare
- 1 Cyprus 100 % compare
- 1 Denmark 100 % compare
- 1 Estonia 100 % compare
- 1 Finland 100 % compare
- 1 France 100 % compare
- 1 French Polynesia 100 % compare
- 1 Germany 100 % compare
- 1 Greece 100 % compare
- 1 Greenland 100 % compare
- 1 Hungary 100 % compare
- 1 Iceland 100 % compare
- 1 Israel 100 % compare
- 1 Italy 100 % compare
- 1 Kuwait 100 % compare
- 1 Lithuania 100 % compare
- 1 Luxembourg 100 % compare
- 1 Maldives 100 % compare
- 1 Malta 100 % compare
- 1 Mauritius 100 % compare
- 1 Mexico 100 % compare
- 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 100 % compare
- 1 New Caledonia 100 % compare
- 1 New Zealand 100 % compare
- 1 Norway 100 % compare
- 1 Palau 100 % compare
- 1 Paraguay 100 % compare
- 1 Puerto Rico 100 % compare
- 1 Qatar 100 % compare
- 1 Republic of Korea 100 % compare
- 1 Romania 100 % compare
- 1 Singapore 100 % compare
- 1 Slovakia 100 % compare
- 1 Slovenia 100 % compare
- 1 Spain 100 % compare
- 1 Sweden 100 % compare
- 1 Switzerland 100 % compare
- 1 Thailand 100 % compare
- 1 Tokelau 100 % compare
- 1 Turkmenistan 100 % compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 100 % compare
- 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 100 % compare
- 1 Uruguay 100 % compare
- 1 Australia and New Zealand 100 % compare
- 1 Polynesia 100 % compare
- 2 Viet Nam 99 % compare
- 3 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 98 % compare
- 4 Lao People's Democratic Republic 96 % compare
- 7 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 94 % compare
- 7 Syrian Arab Republic 94 % compare
More environment data for Türkiye
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -4.66 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -4.91 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.628 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.93 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate -3.83 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value 42.87 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$ 3.38 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pesticides (total) — Import value, annual growth rate -26.07 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pesticides (total) — Export value, gaps filled 209,778 1000 USD (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Türkiye?
- Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services in Türkiye was 96 % in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services recorded in Türkiye?
- The highest recorded value was 96 % in 2017.
- What is the lowest percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services recorded in Türkiye?
- The lowest recorded value was 92 % in 2000.
- How does Türkiye rank for percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services?
- Türkiye ranks 4th out of 18 countries with data for 2024.
- Is percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services rising or falling in Türkiye?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Türkiye data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services (percent) — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.