Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Liberia

Liberia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was 0.0001 million SLC per person in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
0.0001 million SLC per person
Change on year
up 1.3%
World rank
172nd
of 180 countries
All-time high
0.0004 million SLC per person
in 1979
All-time low
0.0001 million SLC per person
in 1994
Years of data
55
1970–2024

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Liberia, 1970–2024

0000197019972024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million SLC per person.

Analysis

The most recent figure for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Liberia is 0.0001 million SLC per person, measured in 2024.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.3% on the previous year and down 5.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Liberia peaked at 0.0004 million SLC per person in 1979 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 million SLC per person, in 1994.

That places Liberia 172nd out of 180 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 55 years of available data.

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Liberia, year by year

Annual values for Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita in Liberia, 1970 to 2024.
Year million SLC per person Change
1970 0.0003 million SLC per person
1971 0.0003 million SLC per person +4.2%
1972 0.0003 million SLC per person -1.3%
1973 0.0003 million SLC per person +4.9%
1974 0.0003 million SLC per person -5.8%
1975 0.0003 million SLC per person +2.4%
1976 0.0004 million SLC per person +7.4%
1977 0.0003 million SLC per person -3.5%
1978 0.0004 million SLC per person +6.0%
1979 0.0004 million SLC per person +1.8%
1980 0.0004 million SLC per person -2.6%
1981 0.0003 million SLC per person -23.9%
1982 0.0003 million SLC per person -2.6%
1983 0.0003 million SLC per person -0.6%
1984 0.0003 million SLC per person +2.7%
1985 0.0003 million SLC per person +1.8%
1986 0.0003 million SLC per person -2.6%
1987 0.0003 million SLC per person +4.2%
1988 0.0003 million SLC per person +0.9%
1989 0.0003 million SLC per person -2.8%
1990 0.0002 million SLC per person -22.2%
1991 0.0002 million SLC per person -0.3%
1992 0.0001 million SLC per person -43.5%
1993 0.0001 million SLC per person -36.8%
1994 0.0001 million SLC per person -18.3%
1995 0.0001 million SLC per person +48.1%
1996 0.0001 million SLC per person +5.9%
1997 0.0002 million SLC per person +71.4%
1998 0.0002 million SLC per person +19.8%
1999 0.0002 million SLC per person +14.2%
2000 0.0003 million SLC per person +24.4%
2001 0.0003 million SLC per person +12.2%
2002 0.0003 million SLC per person +2.5%
2003 0.0002 million SLC per person -30.6%
2004 0.0002 million SLC per person -5.1%
2005 0.0002 million SLC per person -19.5%
2006 0.0002 million SLC per person +9.4%
2007 0.0003 million SLC per person +51.0%
2008 0.0003 million SLC per person +0.8%
2009 0.0003 million SLC per person -10.2%
2010 0.0003 million SLC per person +4.9%
2011 0.0003 million SLC per person +1.9%
2012 0.0002 million SLC per person -17.4%
2013 0.0002 million SLC per person -23.8%
2014 0.0001 million SLC per person -28.6%
2015 0.0001 million SLC per person +9.4%
2016 0.0001 million SLC per person -31.7%
2017 0.0001 million SLC per person +9.1%
2018 0.0001 million SLC per person +4.4%
2019 0.0001 million SLC per person +6.8%
2020 0.0001 million SLC per person +0.5%
2021 0.0001 million SLC per person -0.9%
2022 0.0001 million SLC per person +4.4%
2023 0.0001 million SLC per person -0.8%
2024 0.0001 million SLC per person +1.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 0.0003 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person 10
1980s 0.0003 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person 0.0004 million SLC per person 10
1990s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 10
2000s 0.0003 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person 10
2010s 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0003 million SLC per person 10
2020s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 5

Countries ranked near Liberia

  1. 169 Jordan 0.0001 million SLC per person compare
  2. 170 Zimbabwe 0.0001 million SLC per person compare
  3. 171 Palestine, State of 0.0001 million SLC per person compare
  4. 173 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0001 million SLC per person compare
  5. 174 Kuwait 0.0001 million SLC per person compare
  6. 175 South Sudan 0.0001 million SLC per person compare

See the full ranking of 180 places →

More environment data for Liberia

All data for Liberia →

Frequently asked questions

What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Liberia?
Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Liberia was 0.0001 million SLC per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Liberia?
The highest recorded value was 0.0004 million SLC per person in 1979.
What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Liberia?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 million SLC per person in 1994.
How does Liberia rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Liberia ranks 172nd out of 180 countries with data for 2024.
Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Liberia?
Over the last ten years it is down 5.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Liberia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Liberia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/liberia/">Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Liberia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.