Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was 0.0001 million SLC per person in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
0.0001 million SLC per person
Change on year
down 16.5%
World rank
170th
of 180 countries
All-time high
0.0002 million SLC per person
in 1972
All-time low
0.0001 million SLC per person
in 2008
Years of data
55
1970–2024

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Zimbabwe, 1970–2024

00000197019972024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million SLC per person.

Analysis

The most recent figure for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Zimbabwe is 0.0001 million SLC per person, measured in 2024.

The figure is down 16.5% on the previous year and up 6.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Zimbabwe peaked at 0.0002 million SLC per person in 1972 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 million SLC per person, in 2008.

That places Zimbabwe 170th out of 180 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 55 years of available data.

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Zimbabwe, year by year

Annual values for Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita in Zimbabwe, 1970 to 2024.
Year million SLC per person Change
1970 0.0002 million SLC per person
1971 0.0002 million SLC per person +23.1%
1972 0.0002 million SLC per person +9.6%
1973 0.0002 million SLC per person -21.7%
1974 0.0002 million SLC per person +14.4%
1975 0.0002 million SLC per person -8.9%
1976 0.0002 million SLC per person +8.0%
1977 0.0002 million SLC per person -23.3%
1978 0.0002 million SLC per person +8.6%
1979 0.0002 million SLC per person -1.6%
1980 0.0002 million SLC per person -4.1%
1981 0.0002 million SLC per person +7.2%
1982 0.0002 million SLC per person -10.7%
1983 0.0001 million SLC per person -18.8%
1984 0.0001 million SLC per person +18.8%
1985 0.0002 million SLC per person +19.6%
1986 0.0002 million SLC per person -11.2%
1987 0.0001 million SLC per person -7.4%
1988 0.0001 million SLC per person -0.0%
1989 0.0001 million SLC per person +0.5%
1990 0.0002 million SLC per person +9.1%
1991 0.0002 million SLC per person -1.6%
1992 0.0001 million SLC per person -25.3%
1993 0.0001 million SLC per person +25.3%
1994 0.0002 million SLC per person +7.2%
1995 0.0001 million SLC per person -8.4%
1996 0.0002 million SLC per person +17.8%
1997 0.0002 million SLC per person +1.3%
1998 0.0002 million SLC per person +0.3%
1999 0.0002 million SLC per person +2.0%
2000 0.0002 million SLC per person -0.8%
2001 0.0002 million SLC per person +12.0%
2002 0.0002 million SLC per person -21.9%
2003 0.0001 million SLC per person -10.2%
2004 0.0001 million SLC per person -8.6%
2005 0.0001 million SLC per person -7.0%
2006 0.0001 million SLC per person -5.4%
2007 0.0001 million SLC per person -8.3%
2008 0.0001 million SLC per person -32.5%
2009 0.0001 million SLC per person +38.7%
2010 0.0001 million SLC per person +5.5%
2011 0.0001 million SLC per person -0.4%
2012 0.0001 million SLC per person +6.1%
2013 0.0001 million SLC per person -3.9%
2014 0.0001 million SLC per person +21.3%
2015 0.0001 million SLC per person -6.5%
2016 0.0001 million SLC per person -5.2%
2017 0.0001 million SLC per person +8.4%
2018 0.0001 million SLC per person +16.7%
2019 0.0001 million SLC per person -11.8%
2020 0.0001 million SLC per person +2.4%
2021 0.0001 million SLC per person +15.5%
2022 0.0001 million SLC per person +4.4%
2023 0.0002 million SLC per person +4.5%
2024 0.0001 million SLC per person -16.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 10
1980s 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 10
1990s 0.0002 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 10
2000s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 10
2010s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 10
2020s 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0001 million SLC per person 0.0002 million SLC per person 5

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 167 Andorra 0.0002 million SLC per person compare
  2. 168 Cuba 0.0002 million SLC per person compare
  3. 169 Jordan 0.0001 million SLC per person compare
  4. 171 Palestine, State of 0.0001 million SLC per person compare
  5. 172 Liberia 0.0001 million SLC per person compare
  6. 173 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0001 million SLC per person compare

See the full ranking of 180 places →

More environment data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Zimbabwe?
Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Zimbabwe was 0.0001 million SLC per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 0.0002 million SLC per person in 1972.
What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 million SLC per person in 2008.
How does Zimbabwe rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Zimbabwe ranks 170th out of 180 countries with data for 2024.
Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is up 6.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/zimbabwe/">Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.