Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Ecuador
Ecuador: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Ecuador, 1970–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million SLC per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 15.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Ecuador peaked at 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 1971 and was at its lowest, 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, in 2013.
Ecuador ranks 115th of 179 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | million SLC per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1971 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 1972 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 1973 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 1974 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -37.0% |
| 1975 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1976 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -16.6% |
| 1977 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 1978 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -16.6% |
| 1979 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -14.5% |
| 1980 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -21.2% |
| 1981 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1982 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +10.9% |
| 1983 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 1984 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +15.5% |
| 1985 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +9.0% |
| 1986 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +23.3% |
| 1987 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +12.9% |
| 1988 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +11.5% |
| 1989 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +1.0% |
| 1990 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -0.9% |
| 1991 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 1992 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1993 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1994 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 1995 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 1996 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +3.5% |
| 1997 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 1998 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 1999 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +59.9% |
| 2000 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +11.2% |
| 2001 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -22.1% |
| 2002 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 2003 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 2004 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 2005 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 2006 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 2007 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 2008 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 2009 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +5.4% |
| 2010 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 2011 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 2012 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -9.8% |
| 2013 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2014 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 2015 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +9.9% |
| 2016 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 2017 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +0.5% |
| 2018 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 2019 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +2.2% |
| 2020 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +12.2% |
| 2021 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 2022 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 2023 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 2024 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 112 Tuvalu 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 113 Romania 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 114 South Sudan 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 116 Belarus 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 117 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 118 Saudi Arabia 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
More environment data for Ecuador
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 0.3767 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -1.05 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.4 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.49 °C (2025)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 11.56 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 21.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 0.0006 million SLC per person (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual 21.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit 0 million USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Ecuador?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Ecuador was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 1971.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2013.
- How does Ecuador rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Ecuador ranks 115th out of 179 countries with data for 2024.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 15.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.