Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Cuba
Cuba: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was -1.98 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Cuba, 1971–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Cuba recorded -1.98 % change on previous year for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 86.0% on the previous year and down 188.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Cuba peaked at 19.47 % change on previous year in 1981 and was at its lowest, -23.99 % change on previous year, in 1991.
Cuba ranks 161st of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Cuba, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 8.57 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 4.82 % change on previous year | -43.7% |
| 1973 | 3.45 % change on previous year | -28.4% |
| 1974 | 1.02 % change on previous year | -70.3% |
| 1975 | 9.42 % change on previous year | +819.4% |
| 1976 | 5.35 % change on previous year | -43.2% |
| 1977 | 8.76 % change on previous year | +63.6% |
| 1978 | 6.72 % change on previous year | -23.3% |
| 1979 | 1.25 % change on previous year | -81.4% |
| 1980 | -5.32 % change on previous year | -526.5% |
| 1981 | 19.47 % change on previous year | -466.2% |
| 1982 | 9.6 % change on previous year | -50.7% |
| 1983 | 5.91 % change on previous year | -38.4% |
| 1984 | 8.31 % change on previous year | +40.5% |
| 1985 | -2.17 % change on previous year | -126.1% |
| 1986 | 1.53 % change on previous year | -170.4% |
| 1987 | 2.19 % change on previous year | +43.2% |
| 1988 | 3.45 % change on previous year | +57.5% |
| 1989 | 0.4279 % change on previous year | -87.6% |
| 1990 | -8.74 % change on previous year | -2142.6% |
| 1991 | -23.99 % change on previous year | +174.5% |
| 1992 | -10.32 % change on previous year | -57.0% |
| 1993 | -22.74 % change on previous year | +120.3% |
| 1994 | -4.92 % change on previous year | -78.4% |
| 1995 | 4.11 % change on previous year | -183.4% |
| 1996 | 17.47 % change on previous year | +325.5% |
| 1997 | 2.34 % change on previous year | -86.6% |
| 1998 | -14.11 % change on previous year | -704.4% |
| 1999 | 11.62 % change on previous year | -182.4% |
| 2000 | 9.12 % change on previous year | -21.5% |
| 2001 | 0.8914 % change on previous year | -90.2% |
| 2002 | -2.52 % change on previous year | -382.2% |
| 2003 | 2.39 % change on previous year | -195.2% |
| 2004 | 0.2083 % change on previous year | -91.3% |
| 2005 | -11.64 % change on previous year | -5689.3% |
| 2006 | -6.05 % change on previous year | -48.1% |
| 2007 | 18.04 % change on previous year | -398.4% |
| 2008 | 0.6361 % change on previous year | -96.5% |
| 2009 | -0.216 % change on previous year | -134.0% |
| 2010 | -5.9 % change on previous year | +2633.0% |
| 2011 | 4.32 % change on previous year | -173.2% |
| 2012 | 0.6992 % change on previous year | -83.8% |
| 2013 | 4.7 % change on previous year | +572.3% |
| 2014 | 2.24 % change on previous year | -52.2% |
| 2015 | 2.49 % change on previous year | +11.1% |
| 2016 | 5.79 % change on previous year | +132.2% |
| 2017 | -1.38 % change on previous year | -123.8% |
| 2018 | 2.65 % change on previous year | -291.6% |
| 2019 | -10.96 % change on previous year | -514.1% |
| 2020 | -22.92 % change on previous year | +109.2% |
| 2021 | -13.16 % change on previous year | -42.6% |
| 2022 | -6.07 % change on previous year | -53.9% |
| 2023 | -14.1 % change on previous year | +132.2% |
| 2024 | -1.98 % change on previous year | -86.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 5.49 % change on previous year | 1.02 % change on previous year | 9.42 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 4.34 % change on previous year | -5.32 % change on previous year | 19.47 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -4.93 % change on previous year | -23.99 % change on previous year | 17.47 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.09 % change on previous year | -11.64 % change on previous year | 18.04 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.466 % change on previous year | -10.96 % change on previous year | 5.79 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -11.64 % change on previous year | -22.92 % change on previous year | -1.98 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 158 Philippines -1.49 % change on previous year compare
- 159 Greece -1.9 % change on previous year compare
- 160 Anguilla -1.97 % change on previous year compare
- 162 Belize -1.98 % change on previous year compare
- 163 Japan -2.01 % change on previous year compare
- 164 North Macedonia -2.04 % change on previous year compare
More environment data for Cuba
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -5.3 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -5.17 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.278 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.4 °C (2025)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 4.34 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 0.0006 million SLC per person (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual 4.34 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit 0 million USD per US$ of GDP (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Cuba?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Cuba was -1.98 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 19.47 % change on previous year in 1981.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -23.99 % change on previous year in 1991.
- How does Cuba rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Cuba ranks 161st out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 188.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.