Indonesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area

Indonesia
1,396 1000 ha
in 2022
United Republic of Tanzania
124.91 1000 ha
in 2022
Indonesia rank
9th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area over time

  • Indonesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
05001.0k1.5k199220072022

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 1,396 1000 ha against 124.91 1000 ha in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1,271 1000 ha.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 11.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 224 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 789.42 1000 ha 29 1000 ha 760.42 1000 ha Indonesia
2000s 964.63 1000 ha 45.17 1000 ha 919.46 1000 ha Indonesia
2010s 1,189 1000 ha 71.85 1000 ha 1,117 1000 ha Indonesia
2020s 1,347 1000 ha 112.06 1000 ha 1,235 1000 ha Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area, Indonesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Indonesia, at 1,396 1000 ha against 124.91 1000 ha in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2022.
What is the difference in artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area between Indonesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
1,271 1000 ha, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Indonesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area?
Indonesia ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 224 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/indonesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/indonesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Indonesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.