Ethiopia PDR vs Nepal: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 67,096 t against 66,720 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 376 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 49th and Nepal ranks 48th of 191 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 60,198 t | 38,444 t | 21,754 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 66,019 t | 43,992 t | 22,027 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 69,307 t | 50,291 t | 19,016 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 71,118 t | 52,826 t | 18,292 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia PDR or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 67,096 t against 66,720 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia PDR and Nepal?
- 376 t, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Nepal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Nepal rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 49th and Nepal ranks 48th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).