Madagascar vs Nepal: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Madagascar
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 67,096 t against 66,242 t in Madagascar, a difference of 854 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 50th and Nepal ranks 48th of 191 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 29,377 t | 38,444 t | 9,066 t | Nepal |
| 1970s | 34,715 t | 43,992 t | 9,278 t | Nepal |
| 1980s | 36,235 t | 50,291 t | 14,056 t | Nepal |
| 1990s | 38,883 t | 57,382 t | 18,498 t | Nepal |
| 2000s | 42,128 t | 62,704 t | 20,575 t | Nepal |
| 2010s | 45,320 t | 66,951 t | 21,631 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 57,323 t | 70,296 t | 12,973 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Madagascar or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 67,096 t against 66,242 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Madagascar and Nepal?
- 854 t, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Nepal rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Madagascar ranks 50th and Nepal ranks 48th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).