Southern Europe vs Sudan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Southern Europe
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 232,963 t against 159,412 t in Southern Europe, a difference of 73,551 t.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.5 times Southern Europe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Southern Europe ranks 22nd and Sudan ranks 19th of 29 groups.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Europe | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 145,729 t | 207,514 t | 61,785 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 160,990 t | 280,598 t | 119,607 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Southern Europe or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 232,963 t against 159,412 t in Southern Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Southern Europe and Sudan?
- 73,551 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Europe and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Southern Europe and Sudan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Southern Europe ranks 22nd and Sudan ranks 19th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).