Equatorial Guinea vs North Macedonia: Deforestation embedded in trade
Deforestation embedded in trade over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1,505 hectares against 1,411 hectares in North Macedonia, a difference of 94 hectares.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 90th and North Macedonia ranks 91st of 178 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,536 hectares | 444.62 hectares | 1,091 hectares | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 1,632 hectares | 313.11 hectares | 1,319 hectares | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 1,380 hectares | 835.84 hectares | 544.24 hectares | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deforestation embedded in trade, Equatorial Guinea or North Macedonia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 1,505 hectares against 1,411 hectares in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in deforestation embedded in trade between Equatorial Guinea and North Macedonia?
- 94 hectares, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and North Macedonia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and North Macedonia rank globally for deforestation embedded in trade?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 90th and North Macedonia ranks 91st of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deforestation embedded in trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Deforestation driven by imported goods minus exported goods from agriculture and forest plantations. Net importers of deforestation are countries who contribute to net deforestation in other countries β the deforestation that they cause in other countries is given as a positive value.