Libya vs North Macedonia: Deforestation embedded in trade
Libya
1,507 hectares
in 2023
North Macedonia
1,411 hectares
in 2023
Libya rank
89th
North Macedonia rank
91st
Deforestation embedded in trade over time
- Libya
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Libya currently reports 1,507 hectares against 1,411 hectares in North Macedonia, a difference of 96 hectares.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 89th and North Macedonia ranks 91st of 178 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,806 hectares | 444.62 hectares | 2,362 hectares | Libya |
| 2010s | 2,264 hectares | 313.11 hectares | 1,951 hectares | Libya |
| 2020s | 1,112 hectares | 835.84 hectares | 275.9 hectares | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deforestation embedded in trade, Libya or North Macedonia?
- Libya, at 1,507 hectares against 1,411 hectares in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in deforestation embedded in trade between Libya and North Macedonia?
- 96 hectares, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and North Macedonia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Libya and North Macedonia rank globally for deforestation embedded in trade?
- Libya ranks 89th and North Macedonia ranks 91st of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deforestation embedded in trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Deforestation driven by imported goods minus exported goods from agriculture and forest plantations. Net importers of deforestation are countries who contribute to net deforestation in other countries β the deforestation that they cause in other countries is given as a positive value.