Chad vs Kiribati: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Chad
17.6%
in 2024
Kiribati
20.9%
in 2024
Chad rank
102nd
Kiribati rank
100th
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas over time
- Chad
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 20.9% against 17.6% in Chad, a difference of 3.3%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Chad's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 102nd and Kiribati ranks 100th of 105 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.5% | 17.0% | 1.5% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 16.8% | 19.2% | 2.4% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 17.6% | 20.7% | 3.2% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas, Chad or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 20.9% against 17.6% in Chad as of 2024.
- What is the difference in using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas between Chad and Kiribati?
- 3.3%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Kiribati?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chad and Kiribati rank globally for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
- Chad ranks 102nd and Kiribati ranks 100th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.