Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas in Kiribati

Kiribati: Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas was 20.9% in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
20.9%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
100th
of 105 countries
All-time high
20.9%
in 2022
All-time low
16.0%
in 2000
Years of data
25
2000–2024

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas in Kiribati, 2000–2024

051015202000201220242000: 16 %2001: 16.2 %2002: 16.4 %2003: 16.7 %2004: 16.9 %2005: 17.1 %2006: 17.3 %2007: 17.5 %2008: 17.8 %2009: 18 %2010: 18.2 %2011: 18.4 %2012: 18.7 %2013: 18.9 %2014: 19.1 %2015: 19.3 %2016: 19.5 %2017: 19.8 %2018: 20 %2019: 20.2 %2020: 20.4 %2021: 20.7 %2022: 20.9 %2023: 20.9 %2024: 20.9 %

Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2024, using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas in Kiribati stood at 20.9%. That is the highest value across all 25 years on record.

That represents a change of up 9.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas in Kiribati peaked at 20.9% in 2022 and was at its lowest, 16.0%, in 2000.

That places Kiribati 100th out of 105 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 25 years of available data.

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas in Kiribati, year by year

Annual values for Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas in Kiribati, 2000 to 2024.
Year % Change
2000 16.0%
2001 16.2% +1.4%
2002 16.4% +1.4%
2003 16.7% +1.4%
2004 16.9% +1.3%
2005 17.1% +1.3%
2006 17.3% +1.3%
2007 17.5% +1.3%
2008 17.8% +1.3%
2009 18.0% +1.3%
2010 18.2% +1.2%
2011 18.4% +1.2%
2012 18.7% +1.2%
2013 18.9% +1.2%
2014 19.1% +1.2%
2015 19.3% +1.2%
2016 19.5% +1.1%
2017 19.8% +1.1%
2018 20.0% +1.1%
2019 20.2% +1.1%
2020 20.4% +1.1%
2021 20.7% +1.1%
2022 20.9% +1.1%
2023 20.9% +0.0%
2024 20.9% +0.0%

Kiribati compared with similar countries

  • Kiribati's 20.9% is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 55.4%, 38% of the median. (29 countries reporting)
  • Kiribati's 20.9% is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 62.2%, 34% of the median. (21 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 17.0% 16.0% 18.0% 10
2010s 19.2% 18.2% 20.2% 10
2020s 20.7% 20.4% 20.9% 5

Countries ranked near Kiribati

  1. 97 Benin 28.4% compare
  2. 98 Democratic Republic of Congo 24.2% compare
  3. 99 Nepal 23.6% compare
  4. 101 Nauru 18.7% compare
  5. 102 Chad 17.6% compare
  6. 103 Sierra Leone 12.5% compare

See the full ranking of 105 places →

More environment data for Kiribati

All data for Kiribati →

Frequently asked questions

What is using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas in Kiribati?
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas in Kiribati was 20.9% in 2024, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas recorded in Kiribati?
The highest recorded value was 20.9% in 2022.
What is the lowest using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas recorded in Kiribati?
The lowest recorded value was 16.0% in 2000.
How does Kiribati rank for using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas?
Kiribati ranks 100th out of 105 countries with data for 2024.
Is using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas rising or falling in Kiribati?
Over the last ten years it is up 9.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kiribati data come from?
The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas in Kiribati. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/urban-vs-rural-safely-managed-drinking-water-source/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/urban-vs-rural-safely-managed-drinking-water-source/kiribati/">Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas in Kiribati</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed drinking water in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
105 places, 2,610 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination.