Kiribati vs Nauru: Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source
Kiribati
20.87
in 2024
Nauru
18.66
in 2024
Kiribati rank
100th
Nauru rank
101st
Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source over time
- Kiribati
- Nauru
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 20.87 against 18.66 in Nauru, a difference of 2.21.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Nauru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nauru ahead.
Kiribati ranks 100th and Nauru ranks 101st of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.99 | 18.65 | 1.66 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 19.21 | 18.66 | 0.5504 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 20.74 | 18.66 | 2.08 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source, Kiribati or Nauru?
- Kiribati, at 20.87 against 18.66 in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source between Kiribati and Nauru?
- 2.21, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nauru?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Nauru rank globally for urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source?
- Kiribati ranks 100th and Nauru ranks 101st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Urban vs rural safely managed drinking water source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.