Watermelons — Production, per unit of GDP in Canada

Canada: Watermelons — Production, per unit of GDP was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
0 t per US$ of GDP
Change on year
up 9.2%
World rank
95th
of 116 countries
All-time high
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2020
All-time low
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 1998
Years of data
29
1996–2024

Watermelons — Production, per unit of GDP in Canada, 1996–2024

000001996201020241996: 0 t per US$ of GDP1997: 0 t per US$ of GDP1998: 0 t per US$ of GDP1999: 0 t per US$ of GDP2000: 0 t per US$ of GDP2001: 0 t per US$ of GDP2002: 0 t per US$ of GDP2003: 0 t per US$ of GDP2004: 0 t per US$ of GDP2005: 0 t per US$ of GDP2006: 0 t per US$ of GDP2007: 0 t per US$ of GDP2008: 0 t per US$ of GDP2009: 0 t per US$ of GDP2010: 0 t per US$ of GDP2011: 0 t per US$ of GDP2012: 0 t per US$ of GDP2013: 0 t per US$ of GDP2014: 0 t per US$ of GDP2015: 0 t per US$ of GDP2016: 0 t per US$ of GDP2017: 0 t per US$ of GDP2018: 0 t per US$ of GDP2019: 0 t per US$ of GDP2020: 0 t per US$ of GDP2021: 0 t per US$ of GDP2022: 0 t per US$ of GDP2023: 0 t per US$ of GDP2024: 0 t per US$ of GDP

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.

Analysis

In 2024, watermelons — production, per unit of gdp in Canada stood at 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That represents a change of up 9.2% on the previous year and up 13.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, watermelons — production, per unit of gdp in Canada peaked at 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 1998.

That places Canada 95th out of 116 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Watermelons — Production, per unit of GDP in Canada, year by year

Annual values for Watermelons — Production, per unit of GDP in Canada, 1996 to 2024.
Year t per US$ of GDP Change
1996 0 t per US$ of GDP —
1997 0 t per US$ of GDP +11.9%
1998 0 t per US$ of GDP -23.9%
1999 0 t per US$ of GDP +57.4%
2000 0 t per US$ of GDP -28.4%
2001 0 t per US$ of GDP +9.4%
2002 0 t per US$ of GDP +56.9%
2003 0 t per US$ of GDP -6.5%
2004 0 t per US$ of GDP +21.6%
2005 0 t per US$ of GDP -19.4%
2006 0 t per US$ of GDP +103.3%
2007 0 t per US$ of GDP -3.8%
2008 0 t per US$ of GDP -0.8%
2009 0 t per US$ of GDP +63.9%
2010 0 t per US$ of GDP +20.5%
2011 0 t per US$ of GDP -13.0%
2012 0 t per US$ of GDP +24.7%
2013 0 t per US$ of GDP -1.0%
2014 0 t per US$ of GDP +20.7%
2015 0 t per US$ of GDP +19.4%
2016 0 t per US$ of GDP -8.2%
2017 0 t per US$ of GDP -3.4%
2018 0 t per US$ of GDP -4.6%
2019 0 t per US$ of GDP +13.1%
2020 0 t per US$ of GDP +7.3%
2021 0 t per US$ of GDP -15.2%
2022 0 t per US$ of GDP -7.5%
2023 0 t per US$ of GDP +7.9%
2024 0 t per US$ of GDP +9.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 4
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 10
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 10
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 5

Countries ranked near Canada

  1. 92 Puerto Rico 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
  2. 93 Slovakia 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
  3. 94 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
  4. 96 Bahrain 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
  5. 97 Djibouti 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
  6. 98 Bhutan 0 t per US$ of GDP compare

See the full ranking of 117 places →

More environment data for Canada

All data for Canada →

Frequently asked questions

What is watermelons — production, per unit of gdp in Canada?
Watermelons — production, per unit of gdp in Canada was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest watermelons — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Canada?
The highest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2020.
What is the lowest watermelons — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Canada?
The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1998.
How does Canada rank for watermelons — production, per unit of gdp?
Canada ranks 95th out of 116 countries with data for 2024.
Is watermelons — production, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Canada?
Over the last ten years it is up 13.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Canada data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Watermelons — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 29 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Watermelons — Production, per unit of GDP in Canada. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/watermelons-production-per-unit-of-gdp/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/watermelons-production-per-unit-of-gdp/canada/">Watermelons — Production, per unit of GDP in Canada</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Watermelons — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Watermelons — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Watermelons — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
117 places, 4,901 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Watermelons — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.